No

ID sylw: 104297

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.

No

ID sylw: 104346

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Elliot Cosnett

The Hatton site is on greenbelt and its agricultural nature is the crux of local rural character. Developing on greenbelt is environmentally destructive, ecologically damaging, and economically dangerous; Hatton is notable as a village entirely for its untouched feel, and that postcard-esque ruralism is increasingly in a rapidly urbanising nation; we must not damage out green and pleasant land for yet more housing development that is better suited to other sites.

No

ID sylw: 104474

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Phill Levy

The local infrastructure, notably Hatton station, local roads and Warwick Hospital and not capable of supporting the thousands of extra people and cars this plan would bring.

The Green Belt should be protected to prevent urban sprawl connecting Hatton all the way to Warwick and Leamington.

The environment should be protected, with open spaces and countryside valued by the local community,

Other sites are better suited to this volume of development with better transport and communication options.

No

ID sylw: 104484

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Helen Whittaker

The roads in the surrounding within and around cannot take extra cars, if roadworks occur or the motorway closes it's already gridlocked between Hatton and Warwick. Other infostructure; electricity, gas, water and sewage etc. cannot support the proposed development plans. The development would jeopardise valuable biodiversity, irreplaceable 1,415 acres of Green Belt farmland for food production, as well as put endangered species as further risk. No more trains can be added to lines that travel through Hatton station, it's also a very small station and any work to enlarge it would disrupt a conservation area next to it.

No

ID sylw: 104493

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Calcuty

Main routes aren't suitable for the levels of traffic that this development would bring. Agricultural land is needed and should be kept as such

No

ID sylw: 104517

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Susan Heap

Road infrastructure A46/M40/A4177 cannot currently cope with the weight of traffic. Increased traffic and congestion, will cause pollution detrimental to health. Current health, education, fitness/sports infrastructure and plans not adequate to meet the size of proposed developments. Destruction of green belt including ancient hedges and woodland is contradictory to climate change initiatives and destruction of farm land adversely affect ability for UK to be self sufficient for food.

No

ID sylw: 104596

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Amy Bambridge

My objections centre around the potential impacts on biodiversity, as well as concerns about the ability of the local infrastructure (roads, hospitals and rail connections) to absorb the increase in numbers of people.

No

ID sylw: 104615

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr William Roberts

I object as this proposal involves the loss and destruction of the ancient tranquil attractive countryside and farmland surrounding the small historic village of Hatton, intruding on the attractive isolated setting of its Grade 11* listed church, and adversely affecting the ancient bluebell woodland at Hatton Wood and the historic Hatton canal corridor and its renown flight of locks. The proposal is self-serving and inherently unsustainable as both the site location and Hatton Station lie isolated and remote from the main towns and services in the area, in stark contrast to potential urban extensions of such towns which I support.

No

ID sylw: 104698

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr. James Aggiss

B1 Hatton is unsuitable as a new settlement location and should not be included in the Local Plan for the following reasons:

1. Infrastructure is already insufficient for existing demand. In particular, the A4177 Birmingham Road, the primary link between Hatton and Warwick. The evidence base indicates limited improvement options and this road would become significantly congested.
2. Considerable improvements would be required to the strategic road network, including Stanks Island and Longbridge Island. It is unclear whether such improvements would be deliverable or affordable. This is fundamental to delivering a new settlement site.
3. Site B1 does not have good sustainable transport links and there is limited scope to improve the frequency and capacity of services at Hatton Station or the near non-existent bus service.
4. Other sites including SG07 would provide a better option given proximity to Warwick, connections to principal routes and sustainable transport links. Linking Hatton and Warwick in terms of new development is more logical than a new settlement on the outskirts of Hatton further away from existing built-up areas.
5. The site is within the Green Belt. The other sites in the Plan which are not in the Green Belt should be considered first.

No

ID sylw: 104719

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Parker

I’ve lived here all my life, we live here because it’s in the countryside, I do not want any more housing developments here, the most recent is a disaster, no infrastructure, no consideration to the environment and shoddily built, over priced houses like Union view as well as traffic chaos, Warwick and surrounding area used to be a beautiful place to live but there’s so much awful building happening in the area that it is in danger of becoming another over built area with green space left, just a monoculture of badly built houses

Yes

ID sylw: 104765

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Susan Hood

Close to existing significant urban areas with facilities. Good transport links to north/south via M40/M42. Close to rail. Not impacting an identified Local Wildlife Site.

No

ID sylw: 104868

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Anna Johnston

Lack of essential amenities eg schools and medical facilites;
Road infrastructure already heavily congested; lack of public transport

No

ID sylw: 104906

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Louise Brierley

Development at this site will result in a huge loss of agricultural land and food security. This loss means increased imports causing more environmental damage.
It also means loss of important green belt separating historic Warwick from the West Midlands.
There is currently only one hospital in Warwick and each Winter it struggles to cope with demand to treat sick patients.
The facilities locally do not suit an increased population - not enough GP surgeries, dentists and schools.
Excessive housing in this area is not realistic as the road network would not cope with a proposed town of this size.

No

ID sylw: 104925

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sue Herbert

I disagree with the proposal because:
- negative impact on Green Belt and the local environment
- local infrastructure capcity for an increase in homes is very limited
- public transport largely inadequate now
- increase in traffic is inevitable
- local community facilities already stretched.

Yes

ID sylw: 104945

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Susan Hood

If an area were to be required for new settlements (noting that the provision "required" by this plan is expected to be an overprovision), this is close to transport road & rail (M40/West Coast main line) and existing Warwick infrastructure. No local wildlife sites impacted.

No

ID sylw: 104966

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Charlotte Holme

The traffic!!! Presumably people living there will either have to head in the direction of Birmingham or Warwick. The Warwick direction is already subject to very long queues in the A46 direction. and over to Warwick. It will be daily misery for all in the area.

No

ID sylw: 105007

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Craig Sargant

The plans around Hampton Magna and Hatton are absolutely disgraceful. Such a beautiful area is going to be completely ruined. Flooding is already awful due to the existing developments anymore would make it horrendous. This needs to be drastically reduced. Why target such rural areas. Everyone who moves here does so for that reason. You will have a big fight on your hands perusing this.

Yes

ID sylw: 105013

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Julia Dimambro

Good transport links

No

ID sylw: 105019

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alex Vinti

I object to the inclusion of B1 within the SWLP due to the following reasons..
Road and rail transport links are unsuitable, the site is in green belt and there are more suitable sites available, it will result in the loss of important farmland, habitats and wildlife

No

ID sylw: 105042

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr William Langstone

Roads not sufficient. Ruining the character of unique area of hatton flight.

No

ID sylw: 105045

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lisa Jukes

This proposed development will cause severe pressure on an already overwhelmed road system around Warwick. Hatton Railway station cannot currently, or ever will be able to cope with any more trains and the roads leading to it would not cope with the extra traffic. With a large new town on their doorstep, the character of the villages on the edge of the development would be destroyed. Large areas of agricultural land, woodland and nature habitats would be lost forever.

No

ID sylw: 105057

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Elizabeth Anderson

I need to submit my objections to SITE B1 being considered for development as part of the local plan.
My main grounds for objecting are that the local road and rail services, particularly the Hockley and Birmingham Roads, Stank’s and Longbridge Islands are already stretched to breaking points. The opportunities to develop Hatton Station are not feasible. The carparking is difficult at best and Station road would not cope with an increase in vehicular capacity.
Secondly, I query why 8,000 plus houses can be built on this site without there being local employment opportunities nearby.
I could go on but time does not permit. I endorse the submission made by Warwickshire Wildlife Trust

No

ID sylw: 105058

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rob Geragthy

I formally object to the proposed development at Site B1, highlighting several concerns. Firstly, it is located within the Green Belt, which is essential for preventing urban sprawl. Secondly, the development threatens local biodiversity and risks habitat destruction. Additionally, existing infrastructure is already strained, and the new homes would exacerbate congestion and pressure on services. The site's lack of public transport connectivity would increase reliance on cars, worsening traffic and emissions. Lastly, the scale of the development could disrupt community character. I urge the committee to consider more suitable alternatives.

No

ID sylw: 105060

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sarah Geraghty

I oppose the proposed development at site B1, as it lies within the Green Belt, which is crucial for preventing urban sprawl and preserving the landscape. This development threatens local wildlife and biodiversity while straining already overloaded infrastructure, including roads and schools. Additionally, the site lacks sustainable transport options, forcing reliance on cars, which contradicts environmental goals. Furthermore, the scale of development would disrupt the community's identity and character. I urge the planning committee to reconsider site B1 and explore alternatives that align with sustainability and infrastructure capacity.

No

ID sylw: 105063

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs D Hill

I object to the planning permission for B1 Hatton because the recent housing development around Mayne Close has already strained local resources like schools and health centres. Further housing will significantly impact the area's character, overload infrastructure, and harm local trees and wildlife. The increased demand on water and sewage systems, along with insufficient GP services and limited shopping and schooling options, is concerning. Additionally, the country roads will face more traffic congestion, making cycling unsafe and diminishing the enjoyment of the countryside I have cherished for years.

No

ID sylw: 105064

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brian Jukes

I am a resident of Shrewley and formally object to the proposed development around Hatton in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. My concerns include increased traffic congestion due to inadequate road infrastructure, encroachment on valuable green belt land, loss of green spaces impacting local quality of life, disturbance to wildlife habitats, and a drastic change to the area's rural character. This development threatens the environment and community wellbeing, and I urge authorities to reject it to preserve the natural and cultural integrity of the area for future generations.

No

ID sylw: 105067

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Helen Tindall

I formally object to the inclusion of the Strategic Growth Area at B1 - Land at Hatton in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. As a local resident, I am distressed by the proposal to build 8,000 houses in this green belt conservation area, especially after being denied an extension on my garage. The existing infrastructure, including roads and community services, cannot support such development. The plans disregard the impact on residents' well-being and wildlife habitats, contradicting conservation efforts. I urge planners and councillors to reject this proposal based on these compelling reasons. Thank you for considering my objections.

No

ID sylw: 105073

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr. Andrew Dove

I object to the proposals for housing on site B1 of the South Warwickshire local plan. The local infrastructure is insufficient, with inadequate road networks, limited railway services, and virtually no bus services. Healthcare and educational facilities cannot support an influx of residents, and the development would encroach on vital green belt land, harming local wildlife and the character of the countryside. As a local resident, I believe the area cannot cope with such expansion, and the true housing need is significantly lower than what's proposed. Please include my objections in the official response.

No

ID sylw: 105076

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: James Paulson

I object to the proposed new settlement at site B1 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan due to its significant contribution to the Green Belt, which is essential for preventing urban sprawl. There are seven alternative sites outside the Green Belt, negating any exceptional circumstances. The development would strain existing infrastructure, causing congestion and longer wait times for schools and healthcare. Additionally, it threatens local wildlife habitats and biodiversity. The scale of development is disproportionate, risking the loss of community identity and negatively impacting residents' quality of life.

No

ID sylw: 105087

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sarah Crumpler

Warwick hospital cannot cope with additional demand. There is lack of schools, doctors and dentists for new home owners. Due to lack of train services from Hatton station more people will use cars which will lead to grid lock around Hatton.