Yes

ID sylw: 87365

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

Sustainable development

No

ID sylw: 87366

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Amyes

Considering most of large employers in the Warwick area are based south of the town I can’t except that building 8000 houses north of the A46 and Warwick town centre is the solution to the housing shortage in Warwickshire.
The infrastructure just wouldn’t cope with this amount of growth and the cost to build such an infrastructure doesn’t make this area viable. The local council and developers should be looking to build a new community area south of the town to reduce huge traffic problems.

No

ID sylw: 87482

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Hinett

Justification:
1. Environment: loss of green belt; loss of habitat; loss of green space.
2. Infrastructure: Birmingham Road already at capacity and could not cope with considerable increase in traffic (as was proved by recent gridlocks caused by Union View, a development diminutive in scale by comparison to B1.
3. Urban sprawl: combined with SG07, feels like Warwick would spill over and into Hatton.
4. Loss of agricultural land and farming livelihoods.
5. Hatton would cease to be 'a great place to live'.

No

ID sylw: 87537

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

This is within the green belt

Yes

ID sylw: 87627

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Cassidy

This area is suitable for expansion as it has a train station and is only a short distance to the A46, linking to the M40, M42 and M6, ideal for commuting. Hatton already has a large housing estate and to expand this would have less impact on the public's enjoyment of the green belt, particularly behind Hatton village towards Kenilworth which is predominately large open arable field.

Yes

ID sylw: 87635

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sharon Cassidy

This area is suitable for expansion as it has a train station and is only a short distance to the A46, linking to the M40, M42 and M6, ideal for commuting. Hatton already has a large housing estate and to expand this would have less impact on the public's enjoyment of the green belt, particularly behind Hatton village towards Kenilworth which is predominately large open arable field.

No

ID sylw: 87674

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jo Lancashire

This land will not meet your 20 minute neighbourhood requirement. Its rural location means you are promoting the need for a traditional family of 2 dependants both working to a 2 car family minimum. You cannot get to basic shopping or leisure facilities within 20 minutes and then only by driving. The only travel option are train stations, the cloest are provincial with no parking, poor links to towns and slow. Parking there is also expensive and at capacity. Road networks are already congested. Hatton Country World is a very tired unpopular leisure facility, under invested-in for 10+ years.

No

ID sylw: 87740

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Bamford

I made a summary comment earlier and now wish to expand on this and just some of the reasons why the area around Hatton / B1 is not suitable for housing development .
The area surrounding Hatton station is much loved and enjoyed by all who like the freedom of the countryside, It's a quiet gently beautiful landscape and should not be desecrated.

Yes

ID sylw: 87790

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Katy Grant

More suitable area for housing as already got new developments and infrastructure to support this.

No

ID sylw: 87836

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Hotten

There are no exceptional circumstances to warrant development in the green belt as there are sufficient strategic growth locations and potential new settlements outside of the green belt.

No

ID sylw: 87883

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr STEVEN BLIWERT

Firstly, this is green belt land - this should not be considered at all until all other options are exhausted. Furthermore there area issues around, an increase in traffic, congestion, and inadequate public transport options, with issues like small rural stations at capacity and lack of bus service. a huge strain on local services such as schools, doctors, hospitals, and employment opportunities. A negative effects on local ecology, wildlife, habitats, and reduction of biodiversity. Importantly this huge non-compliance with local development plans and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).

No

ID sylw: 87898

Derbyniwyd: 07/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Wassall

The development on this location should not be allowed as:
It will lead to destruction of the Green Belt.
There is not adequate infrastructure to support additional proposed growth.
There will be negative impact on the highways and traffic congestion will worsen.
There is lack of public services including water supply, drainage, waste services etc.
The development will have a negative impact on the environment.
The residential amenity of the existing area will be negatively impacted.

No

ID sylw: 87901

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Waters

This is a prime example of beautiful Warwickshire countryside that will be destroyed as well as major wildlife that uses this green belt area. Traffic is also terrible on these roads and adding more pressure from housing will take this area beyond its capacity. It’s also an area that 1000’s people use to walk their dogs across the public right of ways across the green belt everyday. Hatton will be destroyed and the countryside with it unfortunately.

Yes

ID sylw: 87915

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Ellerington

This site is close to established infrastructure and settlements and is suitable for development, with good transport infrastructure such as Warwick Parkway and rail services.

No

ID sylw: 87930

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mr mark betker

I object to the proposed B1 Plan as follows:
B1 is a breach of the Green Belt and Green Belt planning guidelines, and an overdevelopment of the rural area.
Will have a detrimental effect on local wildlife, countryside, habitat, historic trees, hedgerows and woods.
There is insufficient existing infrastructure, B1 would overload roads, schools, hospitals, Doctors surgery's and shops.
The B1 Plan will overwhelm existing rural communities and have a severe detrimental effect upon tourism into the area.
There are insufficient public services to support the supply of water, electricity, gas and drainage for sewers and rainfall run off.

Yes

ID sylw: 87950

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Waterworth

I whole heartedly object to proposed development at Hatton. In no way is thexarea prepared for further population.
The roads around the proposed site are chaos. Healthcare is already over whelmed. Takes for ever to see a GP and frequent experience of 10hour plus for A&E. Does not comply with Warwick district strategic objectives. Why are we denying are beautiful green belt from future generations for little benefit to local economy. No evidence of local demand. Ease of commuting to London can not be a justication. Please do not destroy our Warwickshire, a precious rural county.

No

ID sylw: 87960

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Alison Walker

Existing road and rail infrastructure is unable to accommodate volume of additional demand that would be generated. In Recent housing development at Budbrooke and Hatton has not been completed and many houses are unsold. Development would have a significant detrimental impact on the Green Belt and on residents of Hatton Green, Hatton Station, Shrewley and Little Shrewley.

Yes

ID sylw: 88060

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs vivien bryer

n/a

No

ID sylw: 88081

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Karina Bamford

I object for the following reasons:-
This is Green Belt land which supports a huge amount of wildlife, which is clearly seen and enjoyed by many whilst walking in the area.
Surrounding lanes. Two cars can't pass by each other in large narrow parts, which would be un suitable for supporting much more daily traffic.
Bridges over the canal would need major work.
Major improvements would be needed for cyclists, pedestrians and motorists.
Hatton Station is definitely not capable of supporting a vast increase in demand.
Services proposed would not be enough to support such an increase in demand.

No

ID sylw: 88084

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Jane Neary

The build up of Traffic on the Birmingham Road and Hockley Road, Polluton, noise, risk of flooding, potential
risk of crime.
Effect on local wildlife ( we have endangered species here Hedgehogs, bats and birds.
No infrastructure in place we have a crumbling NHS who struggle to staff wards.
Peoples mental health will suffer.
Please take into account that traffic at set times along the Birmingham Road is often stalked up

No

ID sylw: 88085

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Hugh Stephen Williams

The scale of the proposed development is excessive.
There are no adequate local services or facilities to serve such a large development.
Valuable agricultural land will be lost.

No

ID sylw: 88104

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: J Hall

Complete abolition of land required and the infrastructure cannot support with regard to the traffic coming to and from Warwick on the Birmingham Road. There has not been any visible traffic assessment. Warwick access will become as Stratford is, queues for miles of cars to and from.
The plan will completely destroy Warwick if another 'town' is built at Hatton.

Yes

ID sylw: 88116

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Parry

Proposed new settlement has excellent rail and road connections to Warwick, Leamington Spa, Coventry and Birmingham with easy access to the A46 and M40.

No

ID sylw: 88187

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rozanne Harris

Honestly, identifying this area as 'More Suitable' is surely a joke. It's some of the most wonderful green belt land we have. The road infrastructure could not cope with this, what is it, 4 times larger than the existing village?

No

ID sylw: 88196

Derbyniwyd: 07/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Charlie Briggs

I object to the proposed development at Hatton. Various elements are poorly considered:

- the sheer size of the proposal
- the inadequate infrastructure to support it, e.g. roads, access to hospitals, the poor service at Hatton railway station
- the loss of farmland at a time when the UK should be focused on being more self dependent
- loss of wildlife habitat in a pretty part of the county and associated destruction of green belt

I trust that you will consult properly on this topic. I believe there must be more suitable sites for a development of this size.

No

ID sylw: 88197

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Scothern

The choice of "more suitable" locations seems based solely on whether land was offers in the calls for sites. All of the other criteria do not seem to matter. Excluding the call for sites criteria and there are several more suitable options that this one.
The amount of houses available from other three More suitable sites is over 23,000 against a delivery requirement of 28,000.
The plan is over a 25 year planning horizon during which time HS2 will be fully operational. There is uncertainty looking this far ahead it would be better to put the Hatton development on hold.

No

ID sylw: 88215

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Nick Forman

[summarised] As a resident of over 10 years, I think the proposal for 8,000+ homes in this area is far too much for the following reasons:-

1. Loss of agricultural land, food security and the environmental impact of increased imports.
2. Loss green belt, endangered species and the natural habitat
3. The lack of local infrastructure
4. Impact on Warwick Hospital, its parking, and health services
5. Impact on the road network, suitability of Warwick Parkway
6. Options for local young people to be able to buy their first home

No

ID sylw: 88217

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Edwards

I strongly oppose the proposed housing development of up to 8,500 houses in Hatton. Having grown up there and spent time visiting my mother, I am horrified at the thought of such extensive building. This development would destroy the rural character of the area, introducing noise pollution and traffic from thousands of new residents. Hatton has always been a quiet, beautiful place with local amenities that enhance its charm. I believe it is essential to protect the green belt and maintain the vital green spaces that define Hatton's landscape.

No

ID sylw: 88219

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Heidi Thacker

[summarised] As a resident of 25 years, I think the proposal for 8,000+ homes in this area is far too much for the following reasons:-

1. Loss of agricultural land, food security and the environmental impact of increased imports.
2. Loss green belt, endangered species and the natural habitat
3. The lack of local infrastructure
4. Impact on Warwick Hospital, its parking, and health services
5. Impact on the road network, suitability of Warwick Parkway
6. Options for local young people to be able to buy their first home

No

ID sylw: 88220

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sean Edwards

I am strongly opposed to the proposed housing development in Hatton, where I grew up. The plans threaten to spoil the rural character of the area, leaving no countryside and bringing significant noise pollution from increased traffic. This development would disrupt the peaceful environment that includes local amenities and beautiful landscapes, which I cherish and want to preserve for future generations. I believe that Hatton should remain rural and that the green belt must be protected from overdevelopment, as this project could irreversibly damage the area I hold dear.