No

ID sylw: 91111

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Janet Johnson

Disagree with the whole plan which is based on landowner offerings and not on a professional strategic plan. There is evidence that a more appropriate approach would be to use New Towns legislation which would provide for cheaper compulsory land purchase; installation of infrastructure and building of homes and industry that would not be at the whim of developers.
B1 is totally unsuitable for development given its location next to the A4177 and Hockley Heath roads - both already overwhelmed at critical times of the day.
The whole plan seems to be relying on building adjacent to existing unsuitable roads.

No

ID sylw: 91209

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs DONNA BOTHAMLEY

This site is not only greenbelt but rich agricultural and actively farmed land. It is also home to various wildlife some of which are protected. Hatton is a rural area with small lanes and the road infrastructure will not support the increased traffic. Traffic surveys from a proposed smaller site of 4000 houses concluded that the A46 and M40 would become locked. The station at Hatton is too small to support more travel with limited parking and the Warwick parkway is too far to be viable for walkers/cyclists.

A more detailed objection will be attached/emailed

No

ID sylw: 91439

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Jenkinson

The build plans do not evidence sufficient sustainability ambitions, they permanently obliterate the green belt and productive farmland, they go beyond the original growth requirements. Local infrastructure is unsuitable even with further development; schools, health, road and traffic network including M40 Longbridge roundabout and much more. The plan rests on an unsuitable local train station (Hatton) that doesn't have lines to key hubs. Long term impact on local businesses will be detrimental rather than positive.

No

ID sylw: 91478

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Laura Mcdaid

Harm to the character of Hatton Locks and canal conservation area.
Harm to character of Walkway used by pedestrians to access canal towpath.
Increased traffic hazardous using Hatton Flight /Middle Lock lane for walkers.
Location of access to busy road not appropriate.
Harm to Wildlife and protected species.
Home to bats, owls and numerous birds.
Increased light pollution usually a dark landscape on canal. Refer to objections to Planning app W/20/1251 refused in 2024 which is within same area. The WDC conservation objection quoted this as “one of the most sensitive and important sections of the canal conservation area’.

No

ID sylw: 91554

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Neill

Loss of large conservation and green belt area which is home to birds, wildlife and protective species.
Harm character of Hatton Locks Canal area (Stairway to Heaven).
Huge loss of agricultural farm land.
Loss of vital habitat for wildlife.
Increased light and noise pollution.
Warwick Hospital at max capacity already.
Increased traffic on an already congested Birmingham road.
Potentially increased crime.
Harm to the character for visitors using canal tow path.
Warwickshire is already one of the most congested areas in the UK for traffic.
Years of road works and construction traffic.
Environmental destruction to area.

No

ID sylw: 91578

Derbyniwyd: 01/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Steven Bottrill

I strongly object to the proposed settlement of 8,000 homes in Hatton. The area lacks adequate infrastructure, including roads, schools, and healthcare facilities, and will suffer from severe traffic congestion without a relief road. The existing hospital is already overburdened and cannot accommodate the needs of an additional 32,000 residents. Furthermore, this development would lead to increased antisocial behaviour, loss of rural appeal, and detrimental impacts on wildlife and the environment. I believe there are alternative sites available that do not encroach on green belt land.

No

ID sylw: 91605

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Andy Brining

I formally object to the inclusion of Land at Hatton as a Strategic Growth Area in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. As a resident of Hatton Park, I find the plan for up to 8,500 new homes flawed, lacking essential infrastructure like schools and healthcare, and ignoring wildlife habitat concerns. Increased traffic and pollution are also significant issues. The focus on expensive housing does not cater to first-time buyers. I suggest utilising brownfield sites instead. I urge planners and councillors to refuse the allocation proposal due to the overwhelming strain on existing infrastructure.

No

ID sylw: 91611

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Charles Cain

I formally object to the inclusion of Land at Hatton as a Strategic Growth Area in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. As a local resident, I believe that developing this quality farmland threatens national food security. The plans lacks adequate consideration of infrastructure and transport. The recent Union View development has already negatively impacted local traffic. I also object to the proposal for Kingstanding Farm, as it would mar the area's beauty and lacks provisions for local services. I urge planners and councillors to refuse these proposals for the reasons stated. Thank you for considering my objections.

No

ID sylw: 91629

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs Christine Edwards

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed housing development of 8,500 houses in Hatton. Having lived here for nearly 30 years, I chose this area for its beautiful rural surroundings and the quality of life it offers. This development would result in unacceptable noise, loss of privacy, and irreversible damage to vital green spaces. It would transform our rural landscape into a busy urban area, straining local infrastructure and wildlife. I believe Hatton should remain a rural community, with the green belt protected from overdevelopment.

No

ID sylw: 91634

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Kariss Mckeown

I am formally objecting to the inclusion of the proposed New Settlement location at Hatton in the South Warwickshire Local Plan due to my concerns as a local resident. My objections focus on the significant traffic increase from over 4,500 dwellings, the potential exacerbation of flooding in the area, and the adverse impacts on local wildlife and biodiversity. I urge the planning department to reconsider this development and respectfully request that planners and councillors refuse the allocation proposal based on these reasons. Thank you for considering my objections.

No

ID sylw: 91641

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Rosalind Anfilogoff

I am concerned that the proposed development will worsen traffic congestion, compromising safety for pedestrians and residents, particularly as parking is already limited. The local infrastructure cannot support an increase in cars, and there is no apparent demand for additional housing, given that recent developments remain unoccupied. Healthcare services are overstretched, and the environmental impact will harm biodiversity. The scale and design will not fit the area's character, risking overdevelopment and noise disruption. I strongly urge the planning office to reassess the proposal and its potential impacts.

No

ID sylw: 91802

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jonathon Gibson

Scale of development is completely inappropriate! Local infrastructure cannot cope as it is yet alone thousands of new homes.

No

ID sylw: 91826

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Helen Alexander

A huge development next to an already busy road network which reaches capacity during rush hour. Recent roadworks at the much smaller development at Hatton have caused big increases to local commuting times.
I also have real concerns about how local NHS services and schools will be able to cope with the additional number of residents in the area. These additional services would need to be developed before thousands of new houses are built and local hospitals and school are already running at capacity.
This development would turn the countryside into yet another big housing estate.

Yes

ID sylw: 91836

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Luke Russell

The impact to biodiversity and identity of surrounding villages will be less than alternative proposed sites. The cost of mitigation of flood risk and traffic upgrades will be cheaper than alternative sites.

No

ID sylw: 91840

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Nicola Mason

Please don't build on the greenbelt which this area is.

The road network A46/A4177 and A46/M40 junctions could not take the extra journeys that would come from the proposed 4000 or 8000 houses for this area. Currently it regularly comes to a standstill at the slightest interference in traffic flow.

Hatton railway station is too small to support this level of development.

No

ID sylw: 91907

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Poppy Hickin

Myself and my partner have bought our first home together in Hatton Park. We knew the area we wanted to live in was Hatton for a very long time, due to its beautiful countryside and amazing community.

Unfortunately after we moved into our home, the Taylor wimpey site was constructed and there is now talk of another 8,500 homes. We worked very hard to buy our own home in our dream area and I feel that it is being destroyed by infrastructure and over population. Working in a Warwick local school myself, I know the deep struggle we face in and around Warwick for school placements and the lack of, this will be greatly impacted if there is more infrastructure to be built.

I'm disappointed that this could go ahead and wanted to express my concerns and upset over this in the hopes to save Hatton.

No

ID sylw: 91917

Derbyniwyd: 05/02/2025

Ymatebydd: James Gilbert

I would like to object to the idea of the new built houses based on the below

* loosing all the nice green areas and countryside
* more traffic on the roads which would cause major congestion and not environmental Friendly

* major concern is the impact it could have on the sale of my property if I come to sell

No

ID sylw: 91939

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kitten Von mew

Extremely bad road structure

Yes

ID sylw: 91963

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James OShea

This is a location that is in close proximity to good highways and rail infrastructure and employment centres.

No

ID sylw: 91983

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Wilson

I am against the proposed size of the development of B1 due to: the highways not being able to cope with the volume of the additional traffic; the loss of green belt; the impact on the rural character of the area; the loss of wildlife habitats leading to a decrease in local species and lack of diversity; the loss of public footpaths through the area, enjoyed for their location in green space.

No

ID sylw: 92013

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sarah curtis

I have been horse riding around Hatton for over 30 years. I have seen a huge increase in traffic using the once quiet lanes and find it hazardous to ride. I have witnessed the construction of the M40 and the loss of many trees and countryside in Hatton. I don't see how the area could support more development

No

ID sylw: 92023

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Valerie Whittaker

The proposed new settlement at B1, Hatton, is to be built on Green Belt and viable farm land. This includes a thriving dairy farm, one of the few left in the area, and we need to retain such farmland. Without such farms and agricultural land we will be unable to feed ourselves without relying on imports from abroad. This surely cannot be environmentally sustainable.

Other

ID sylw: 92076

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robin Broughton

Not really
Local roads and facilities in Warwick can’t cope already
Unjust enrichment of greedy landowners
But better than pure greenbelt destruction and good motorway and rail links

No

ID sylw: 92093

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Deborah Wilson

I am against the proposed size of the development of B 1 due to: the highways not being able to cope with the volume of additional traffic; the loss of green belt; the impact on the rural character of the area; the loss of wildlife habitats leading to a decrease in local species and lack of diversity; the loss of public footpaths through the area, enjoyed for their location in green space.

Other

ID sylw: 92145

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Deanna Fernie

Land at Hatton is currently protected by Green Belt which is there to preserve the historic character of the landscape, chiefly the flight of locks, and the country park, 'Hatton Country World, which depends in part on its rural location. However, the Country World is a commercial enterprise rather than a historic landmark, unlike Wilmcote which houses Mary Arden's Farm, one of the five Shakespeare Houses which is vital for Stratford's tourism. A new settlement here would also be further from the main conurbation at Warwick than BW would be from Stratford, and should therefore be preferred as an option.

No

ID sylw: 92174

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust

It makes no sense to disrupt the beautiful wildlife in these rural areas. Its a beautiful village and will completely change the whole atmosphere of a rural village vibe. The hospital simply cannot accommodate the people in south Warwickshire as it is let alone another 8000 houses worth of people. The schools are already at maximum capacity and the traffic around south Warwickshire is already horrendous. The whole idea is totally unrealistic.

No

ID sylw: 92205

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Sara Burney

Hatton is a tiny place, and not well served by arterial routes. Hatton Country World is a tourist attraction, but who wants to attend a tourist attraction in the middle of a soulless housing estate? The roads cannot cope with the additional traffic, and the scale of the proposal is entirely disproportionate to the area. Once the greenbelt is gone, it's gone forever.

No

ID sylw: 92244

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sally Porter

As a Hatton resident, I strongly disagree with this proposal for the following reasons:-
Loss of countryside and valuable farming land. This is valuable green belt land and wildlife habitats will be destroyed.
Pressure on roads already at near full capacity-longbridge, stanks, A46, Warwick gridlock issues
Additional pollution
insufficient services to cater for additional population-schools, doctors and hospitals
Can the required improvements to roads, services and the station be delivered and affordable?
A population increase of 18000 would destroy our rural location, the canal and locks are currently a beautiful tourist attraction to visit.

No

ID sylw: 92254

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Veronica Chapman

The scale of this proposed development will completely change the character of the area and have a detrimental impact on Warwick town, along with loss of valuable Green belt land. Road connectivity is already poor, accidents on the A46 and M40 create immense holdups on surrounding roads. Reliance on future rail travel will not work. Hatton station is small and poorly serviced with no option for extension due to its location, meaning more road travel to Warwick Parkway. Transport requirements alone, make this an unsuitable site. Burden on existing facilities awaiting new to be built would be huge and unrealistic.

Other

ID sylw: 92257

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy Horner

Im worried about the traffic implications on the A4189 and the surrounding minor roads which are already having problems with any changes to the area(roadworks to name one)
Warwick pathway is already near capacity