BASE HEADER
Potential Settlement Question B1
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93282
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Samantha Perry-Evans
This is such a beautiful area of green space and farm land and will spoil the environment whilst putting huge pressure on old warwick road and Birmingham road
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93294
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Duncan Taylor
This meets the criteria
PD1 Spatial Growth Priority Area
PD 12 Location for employment growth
Good rail access
Good bus access
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93311
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alison Soutter
This land is green belt which has has always served the purpose of separating the settlement of Hatton from warwick. It provides home to diverse wildlife and native trees.
This site is located across the Grand union canal and railway. Small lanes (Station road, Dark Lane, Ugly Bridge Road) provide vehicle access across these. The infrastucture to support heavy traffic including large construction vehicles simply does not exist and access to this land will always be resticted.
The railway service at Hatton is very limited with no scope for expansion. A new settlement based on current transport links is misguided.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93318
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong
Hatton Station suffers from the same issues as Kingswood, it is small, lacks parking, and the rail line is already at capacity according to WCC’s Rail Strategy. The station geography makes it very difficult to provide substantial expansion, in platform length or parking. Without railway improvement, a settlement here would be car dependent, causing traffic issues into Warwick and breaking the 20-minute neighbourhood principles. The site is in the Green Belt and would lead to effective expansion of Warwick town.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93363
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ian Michael Hayes
The land is all greenbelt and should remain so.
The road infrastructure around the area is made up of country lanes andis not capable of supporting significant additional traffic.
There are very few local facilities.
The rail link that was the key logic for the council to approach the landowner, cannot be developed to the size and capacity that is anticipated from the landowners planning team.
Provision of suitable utilities will be hugely expensive.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93366
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwick District Council
The proposed development at site B1 fundamentally undermines the core visions of the South Warwickshire Local Plan. The site's lack of connectivity, inadequate infrastructure, and detrimental environmental impact make it an unsuitable location for development. I urge the council to reconsider this proposal and prioritize sustainable development that genuinely benefits the entire South Warwickshire region.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93373
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Daryl Kerin
B1 to be excluded. 1) Within the Green belt
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93398
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Ewa Kerin
Green Belt to be protected
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93404
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Norton Lindsey Parish Council does not believe that settlement location ‘B1 - ‘Land at Hatton’ should be included within the new plan. There are several reasons that this is the case – in particular the impact on the green belt and local health and education services.
The most significant potential impact that will affect the Parish of Norton Lindsey directly is of increased traffic on the local rural road network. The impact of this development on this network would be significant and, without substantial mitigation, disastrous. Significant intrusive highway and traffic calming measures would need to be put in place.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93432
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Denise Holroyde
Warwick Parkway station is already operational. There is land available for housing and businesses.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93443
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Teresa Hayes
Loss of Green Belt, ancient woodland, essential productive farmland. Loss of natural habitats and increase in light pollution. Increase in carbon emissions during and after construction. Inadequate infrastructure due to narrow roads , dangerous junctions and subsequent increase in carbon emissions due to increase in essential car usage, delivery and construction vehicles. The railway station access is narrow and dangerous. The carpark is small with no room to expand. The rail service is at full capacity, infrequent and unreliable for commuters thereby increasing car dependency. Warwick Hospital has stated that it cannot cope with current demand. Emergency services will struggle.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93460
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Gordon Barnard
Site B1: Hatton
1. Hatton station is inadequate for the amount of people
2. this will cause people to drive to Warwick Parkway which will cause
2a traffic clogging on the narrow country roads
2b more parking issues in the village that is already a chicane due to parked cars
3. Warwick hospital already has trouble supporting the people in the area, it will collapse under the extra weight
4. Warwick schools will suffer similarly
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93498
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Amanda Barnard
Warwick hospital is already struggling to cope with the number of patients it has. The additional numbers will be untenable for it.
Hatton station is too small to cope with the extra number of passengers expected to need it, so many more cars will have drive to the next station - Hampton Magna. This will increase the traffic beyond the captivity of narrow country roads and cause severe jams and blockages in our village. More people will need to park in our village when the station car park runs out of space, causing dangerous parking in the village.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93505
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Emma McNab
I oppose the B1 development due to several key concerns: it will worsen traffic congestion on the already busy B1477, compromise road safety, and strain local infrastructure. The development encroaches on protected Green Belt and Canal areas, threatening local businesses, tourism, and vital green spaces. Its scale is incompatible with the rural character of the countryside, drastically changing the area’s landscape. It also risks damaging local ecosystems, wildlife habitats, and protected trees. Additionally, the influx of new residents will burden public services, including schools, healthcare, and utilities, which are already under pressure
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93523
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bernard Davis
This area is far to small to form the basis of a self-contained sustainable location. Its location close to Warwick will mean that it remains a satelite of its larger neighbour. The site is divided by the railway and canal. The rural nature of the canal with all its leisure facilities will be ruined. The site is in the green belt with no "exceptional circumstances"
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93535
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Amanda Barnard
Site B1 Hatton
Warwick hospital is already struggling to cope with the number of patients it has. The additional numbers will be untenable for it. Hatton station is too small to cope with the extra number of passengers expected to need it, so more cars will have drive to the next station - Warwick Parkway. This will increase the traffic beyond the captivity of narrow roads and cause severe jams and blockages in Hampton Magna. More people will need to park in our village when the station car park runs out of space, causing dangerous parking in the village
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93561
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Jon Redhead
The area at Hatton is near perfect for a new settlement as it has fantastic access to transport links including a rail network Station, and major arterial road connection, as well as much employment in close proximity. Close Green Belt land would not be destroyed, and more recent housing developments fairly close by, have proved this. The cycling aspect could be factored in, as the road network could accept the modifications as required.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93765
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr William Campbell
This countryside is a valuable local resource to the community. We should protect our greenbelt areas.
Whilst some small development to improve access to housing to meet needs is required, the scale should be of appropriate proportion.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93766
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Carla Smith
Went to Warwick A&E in 02/25–no seats free in waiting room, was there for hours, dr examined me stood in the corridor, due to lack of space.
Birmingham Road is often backed up headed east toward Warwick/A46–often 2 miles past Hatton Arms Pub.
Inappropriate to develop Green Belt.
It is already difficult to get a GP appointment at Priory.
We are applying for 6th Form 2025, and two have said that they’re unprecedentedly oversubscribed. One issued us with an early rejection, citing the number of applicants this year, despite our student having the required predicted grades for entry.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93774
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Minhaz Ali-Bache
it is suitable because it is
PD1 Spatial Growth Priority Area
PD 12 Location for employment growth
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93843
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Bennett
This site is valuable green belt, the area is unspoilt, with pristine countryside, including a strategically important long-established dairy farm. This all should not be lost. There is no advantage in terms of infrastructure, insufficient power and land drainage, country lanes which cannot support any increase in traffic and there is no access to the M40. The B4439 is completely unsuitable. As a narrow and hilly road with sharp bends and dips, greater traffic use would be dangerous. There are insufficient community facilities for retail, health or education, no employment opportunities locally and Hatton station is unsuitable to be expanded.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93864
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Judith Molina
The access to Hatton is narrow lanes with bends, already with traffic, horses, bicycles and dog walkers, there are no footpaths and no lighting, with thousands more cars it would be gridlocked and with no work or schools locally everyone would have to commute. To make access viable would destroy hedgerows, wildlife and productive farmland. Our farmers are struggling already, we need to help and support them and encourage local food production for the sake of our health and the environment.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93975
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sue Scurrah
A development of the proposed size would totally change the nature of the area, adversly affecting wildlife habitats, impacting food production through loss of farm land, reducing access to the countryside for leisure with all the benefits that brings, and add to further congestion on already overused roads.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94013
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr William Senior
It is absurd that B1 has made it this far through the process. (1) Travel infrastructure is completely inadequate and could never be developed to support any scale of building above 200 homes, let alone many thousands e.g. the A4177 and B4439 roads both regularly had 300+ car queues in both directions for many hours each day when just 150 homes were being built recently at Union View (Hatton Park) (2) This is will destroy the habitats of thousands of animals and significantly damage the planet, adding to global climate crisis. (3) This is farmland critical for UK's food security.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94027
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr John Clayton
the effect of additional housing in this location will make travel to Warwick and the M40 much more difficult. It is already a problem with the existing development of Union View. The Green Belt must be maintained to protect the environment which provides habitat for wild life and the maintenance of mental well being for those local people, who currently enjoy it.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94076
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Horton
Hatton already takes a huge amount of traffic with the more rural communities travelling through to access the motorway network, Warwick, Stratford and Leamington. At peak times Hatton becomes grid-locked adding 15-20 minutes to a short journey. The proposal to add so many new residential properties will make this issue worse.
Much of the road infrastructure surrounding Hatton is rural roads. These roads are already dangerous places to be without the additional volume of traffic this development will inevitably cause.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94079
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Sally Rose
I object to building 8,000 homes around Hatton railway station. This would add approx 16,000 cars to our roads, leading to:
Traffic Congestion
Air Pollution: Increased emissions harming public health.
Noise Pollution: Higher noise levels affecting residents' quality of life.
Public Health Concerns: Exacerbating respiratory and cardiovascular conditions.
The suggestion that residents will primarily use the railway as a mode of transport is unfounded. Surveys indicate multiple barriers to this statement, such as high ticket prices.
Lane Farm has been worked over many years, a sustainable source of food and employment how can you justify building here instead of elsewhere?
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94147
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Lily Bothamley
I travel regularly to the Hatton area to visit family. I am extremely concerned about the impact on the local roads with the proposed development as the majority of traffic from the proposed site will lead to the Hockley Road, Birmingham Road junction causing severe traffic congestion. I am unable to travel by train or bus to the area as the local transport is limited.
When visiting the area I enjoy the walks through the greenbelt land and note that most is farmed land. I am concerned about the impact on the food production in the area for future generations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94193
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Helena Flisowski
This site has good transport links, M40, A46 and A4177 and is close to amenities in Warwick
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94198
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Helena Flisowski
Hatton would be a suitable site as it has good transport links M40, A46 and A4177. Hatton is near to Warwick town centre and the new settlement would add vibrancy to the town , bringing more income for shops and other businesses.