No

ID sylw: 88223

Derbyniwyd: 01/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Christina Clinton-Bottrill

I strongly object to the proposed settlement of 8,000 homes in Hatton. The local roads and rail services cannot support the additional traffic, leading to gridlock and chaos. The infrastructure, designed for a village, is inadequate for a town, with already stretched healthcare and education facilities. This development threatens the rural appeal of the area, causing economic decline and increased antisocial behaviour. Environmentally, it would destroy farmland and wildlife habitats. While housing is needed, Hatton is unsuitable; alternative sites outside the green belt should be considered.

Yes

ID sylw: 88537

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

Provided the proper infrastructure is provided to coincide with occupation, and a safe cycle route to Warwick.

No

ID sylw: 88565

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Victoria Connolly

I don't believe that Location B1 (Hatton) should be considered for inclusion within the plan, as the local single track roads, (particularly Dark Lane and Norton Curlieu Lane) are already overloaded and unsafe. It is simply not feasible that the new community would not use these roads. Also, the trains that run to Hatton are not regular enough to allow for commuting by rail and there is no footway on Station Road to access the station safely on foot. I also understand there's no mains gas to most of this site, making homes there unaffordable to run without kerosene tanks.

No

ID sylw: 88566

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jennifer and Gary Ingram

I do not understand why you would harm the residents of Hatton park with proposing to build an industrial site on wedgenock farm. This is grossly unfair to the quality of life of the residents adjacent to those fields which is green belt . Unethical of the council when you have m40 land non green belt and less disruptive. The traffic disruption was horrendous there for six months then another 12 months. A usual 10 minute commute would take 45 minutes again affecting the quality of life for people living there. Trains are extortionate so will not bring people in.

No

ID sylw: 88590

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Hollie Hammond

I wish to object to the proposed housing sites in Budbrooke Ward. Having lived in Hatton since 2001 and now in Hampton Magna, I am concerned about the destruction of open landscapes and farmland. I have lifelong injuries that make road safety essential, and I want to protect Budbrooke from increased traffic. The green belt is vital for our well-being and cultural heritage. Additionally, with Warwick Hospital facing overcapacity issues, more housing will exacerbate traffic and pollution, putting lives at risk. I would appreciate your help in voicing my concerns.

Yes

ID sylw: 88603

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Yes given the strategic location to rail network and significant road infrastructure for the south and the north of England.

No

ID sylw: 88725

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Lane

This possible development seems to be built on a plan for the owners of the Hatton land to cash-in on the need to develop more housing without any consideration of the surrounding communities. Indeed, the plans being considered will potentially swamp the local communities of long standing and fundamentally change these communities and the way of life developed (e.g. pensioners) within them without any due regard to their feelings and needs.

No

ID sylw: 88746

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Price

Inappropriate development of the Green Belt surrounding Hatton Park would negatively impact the area, diminishing its character. As a resident for 20 years, I have valued the natural environment for both personal and family enjoyment, especially during lockdown. Local infrastructure cannot handle increased traffic, evidenced by existing jams on Birmingham Road and A46. Additionally, there are insufficient schools, doctors, and shops to support a population surge. Increased housing would introduce noise and pollution, compromising health and enjoyment of the countryside, while also leading to loss of privacy for residents.

No

ID sylw: 88752

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: John Ciriani

The land should be used for agriculture not housing development. It is unsuitable for additional housing and we should not loose good quality farm land that can never be replaced. We should not rely on imported food as much as we do.

No

ID sylw: 88769

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Neil Ford

I would like to register a dissatisfaction to all and every plan to change all out beautiful landscape to industrial or residential around Hatton A4177 and Hatton village a few miles away from me .. around Hatton Country World AND now apparently development near the roundabout off the A46 at the end of A4177

Asides from the obvious carnage of the volume of traffic .. the greenery loss is just as staggering.

This is all ludicrous and will ruin and devalue our properties and encourage me if successful to have to leave my area and that would be too hard to take.

Yes

ID sylw: 88773

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Sumnall

Very necessary, must be done!

No

ID sylw: 88808

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Abbie Daw

Infrastructure cannot cope
Flooding
We want to be a village that’s why we live here
Traffic will be ridiculous
Roads will be more dangerous for the children as people will speed more
Current house prices will fall
Emergency services will take longer to get out to us due to increased volume of cars on the road

No

ID sylw: 88888

Derbyniwyd: 04/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Paulette Hockley

Green belt land
Excess, traffic, noise, light pollution, Birmingham road is busy enough now . Absolutely no green
spaces will be left and I will have to drive to walk my dogs . Hatton station will not cope , all adding to CO2. The hospitals ,Drs school will cope with demand . The school is such a friendly well balanced school. I will be surrounded by the building work. Rural should mean rural.

No

ID sylw: 88938

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Julia Brealey

This is greenbelt which should stop the merging of urban settlements.
The train service is insufficient to cope with the current commenter traffic to Birmingham and London
This is agricultural land and should remain so otherwise how are we going to feed our growing nation.
The current road system cannot cope with the current volume of traffic and if the m40 has an issue the whole area is gridlocked.

No

ID sylw: 88972

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Gail Marie Eynon

I strongly object to the new settlement at Hatton for the following reasons.
1. Rail Network not viable
2. Infrastructure not in place and never will be
3. Geographical location prohibits infrastructure to provide sustainable options
4. The information provided is flawed and has no basis for its recommendations.
5. We need a local survey to be completed to ensure that wildlife, historical, archaelogical matter is preserved
6. Schools, Hospitals, Dentists, other local health requirements not covered or not for some time
7. The lack of thought around mental health for living with this disruption for 25 years.

No

ID sylw: 88980

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Eynon

I strongly object to the new settlement at Hatton for the following reasons. 1. Rail Network not viable 2. Infrastructure not in place and never will be 3. Geographical location prohibits infrastructure to provide sustainable options 4. The information provided is flawed and has no basis for its recommendations. 5. We need a local survey to be completed to ensure that wildlife, historical, archaelogical matter is preserved 6. Schools, Hospitals, Dentists, other local health requirements not covered or not for some time 7. The lack of thought around mental health for living with this disruption for 25 years.

No

ID sylw: 89068

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sara Bird

I feel strongly that this proposed new settlement is too big, over significant green belt, does not have good enough access to infrastructure and sets a precedence for development in the open countryside that warwickshire is known for. That said some development to the Kenilworth side of the A4177 in Hatton would make sense where it joins the existing built up area.

Yes

ID sylw: 89073

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Julie Hudson

As I respond to these questions for places not far from my home, I'm thinking about transport. flood risk and green spaces. Yes, on the basis of the rail link. However, flood risk is a concern here and could pose unwanted challenges. I note that green spaces are fragmented over to the east. I think it would be far better to grow green space there, rather than houses.

No

ID sylw: 89125

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association

Existing rural nature needs to be preserved in line with your stated Strategic Objectives.

No

ID sylw: 89163

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Rhiann Storey

No sound assessment of site B1, particularly of the infrastructure investment required for it to be feasible, could lead to a decision that this site should be preferred. It is pristine open countryside, used for agriculture and leisure, within the green belt alongside a conservation area. It is a haven for wildlife and an example of locations the NPPF green belt policy is designed to protect. Compared with site E1, which is largely brownfield and not in the green belt, the inclusion of B1 is peculiar and reflective of the availability of land as opposed to its suitability for development.

No

ID sylw: 89279

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Boryana Mladenova

Too many houses ruining the amazing country side. Not enough childcare, schools, clinics or even roads. As a mother, i can say that we have been waiting for a year for childcare. This is not a right place to build so many houses.

No

ID sylw: 89361

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms S Vincent

Already sufficient building taking place there. Busy road, insufficient infrastructure to support more traffic and homes.

No

ID sylw: 89426

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Greenaway

Hatton Railway Station could no possible deal with the extra footfall. This development would over load the already Warwick hospital. The Old Warick rd could not deal with any more cars its at a stand still often at present.

Yes

ID sylw: 89441

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Tim Twynam

Agree more logical because of the Longbridge major interchange.

Yes

ID sylw: 89451

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Thomas Jackson

Suitable location based on existing infrastructure links

No

ID sylw: 89470

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila WALLINGTON

where there is no lighting or pedestrian access. This road is very narrow as is the Pinley Road (C136 0) and Dark Lane (C93 0)
I object to the loss of over 1000 acres of farmland /countryside . The site covers an area of the Forest of Arden - green belt. I have looked at the area covering Site X1 and X2 which I consider to be far more suitable. A possible new motorway junction , suggested park and ride to Leamington Station and general refurbishment of Leamington Station all make this site attractive and minimum impact on South Warwickshire.

No

ID sylw: 89487

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr jeffrey lindsay

1400+ acres of permanent loss of productive farmland and destruction of Green Belt!! Junction improvements would be needed for A4177, B4439 (Dark Lane) & Station Road from A4189. Dark Lane, Norton Curlieu Lane & Station Road essentially single road as two cars barely able to pass each other. Access to Railway at Hatton Station would not be greatly suitable for pedestrians/cyclists, cars, let alone buses, & very small car park - and two platforms only accessible by footbridge! Two new canal bridges would be needed for access - or single-way 'traffic-lights'.

No

ID sylw: 89502

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr JEFFREY PORTER

I object to the proposed new housing development due to several significant concerns:

Insufficient Infrastructure: M40 J15 Longbridge island is already at or near capacity and will require a major upgrade

Inadequate Access Road: The access road is too narrow and cannot be widened, leading to congestion, safety risks.

Loss of Farmland and Countryside: 1,415 acres will be permanently lost, harming the local ecosystem.

Lack of Essential Amenities: No shops or doctors' surgeries for the new housing

Gridlock on the Birmingham Road: We've only recently recovered from 18 months of gridlock.

I urge the planning authority to reject the proposal

No

ID sylw: 89537

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton

This is green belt land. Also Hatton is so beautiful and one of my favourite places to walk, please don't ruin it with ugly houses.

No

ID sylw: 89608

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Smith

unsuitable existing single track road infrastructure with no possibility of upgrading.
valuable agricultural land
greenbelt protecting against merging of towns *(the new town and Warwick) + urban sprawl from Warwick + changing the character of warwickshire landscape dotted with small settlements.
unsuitable rail station - poor services and high costs + no access to platforms 2 & 3 for people with disabilities.
unsuitable location for social housing - would isolate them from services, shops etc unless they use the train at high cost.
Canal is unsuitable as a cycle path due to existing narrow bridges - danger