No

ID sylw: 92109

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Rev Tim BRoadbent

This is an area of incredible beauty, rare birds and important wildlife habitat.

No

ID sylw: 92114

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs stella Parton

Living in Leamington gives us access to a beautiful town but within minutes to beautiful countryside. From home we can walk through the fields from Bamburgh Grove all the way to Saxon Mill , good for us physically and mentally.
The housing plan can be met without building on green belt. This area is not a sustainable location and would promote car use. The farmland is high quality agricultural land and makes a strong contribution to sustainability and to the security of our food supply - something that was a huge worry during the pandemic.

No

ID sylw: 92122

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Jennings

South Warwickshire's housing need can be met without building on Green Belt land.
SG06 is not a "sustainable location".
The Green Belt around North Leamington continues to fulfil the stated purposes of Green Belt Land.
The Green Belt Review informing the Plan is flawed.
The farmland is high quality agricultural land and makes an important contribution to sustainability and security of food supply.
The same proposals were rejected by the Planning Inspector in 2017.
SG06 contributes to the SWLP principles "healthy, safe and inclusive" and "biodiverse and environmentally resilient".

No

ID sylw: 92132

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Simon Oxley

SG06 greenbelt comprises productive arable land growing cereals, oilseeds, protein crops & grassland, is farmed sustainably using direct drilling and companion crops for soil health, with overwinter cover crops which are beneficial to wildlife, plus well maintained grass margins and hedges providing cover and food to wildlife. The, tree, scrubland and water make it a wildlife haven adjacent to built up areas. SG06 has well maintained pathways allowing people to walk in the countryside benefiting their physical and mental health. The loss of this land used for food production, wildlife and people's wellbeing will be detrimental to the surrounding area.

No

ID sylw: 92287

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Horlor

Totally disagree that the plans for this area . This land is well used as farming land, the farmer takes great care of his fields, using it to supply wheat for the local companies, its well maintained, with care, local inhabitants to walk through on well defined paths.
Developers are not interested in the effect this will have on surrounding areas, Old Milverton road is already well used.
I’m aware that as Country we need to build houses for our ever expanding population. Proposed houses will be affordable houses and will there be any Schools, doctors or amenities in the plans,????

Yes

ID sylw: 92294

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Harbury Parish Council

this is an appropriate extension of Leamington

No

ID sylw: 92527

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ken Simons

Further Incursion into Greenbelt land
Increased development in this area will not only result in the loss of productive agricultural land and its associated Landscape Character it is against policy when other locations are proposed .
The proposed site is the northern gateway to Warwick.
The A4177 and A46 are already heavily congested at peak times and cause gridlock in Warwick
M40 J15 is also operating at close to capacity.

No

ID sylw: 92749

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Cat Jackson

This area is the only green space for residents in north Leamington. Without this space we would need to get in a car to walk a dog and enjoy the countryside.
North Leamington School is already a very large school. There is already a huge amount of traffic queing between Kenilworth and Leamington Spa in the mornings/evenings.

No

ID sylw: 92763

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Bligh

South Warwickshire's housing needs can be met without building on greenbelt land that is of high agricultural & ecological quality. Nor can the area support new housing & associated traffic & people density. Traffic will increase, not decrease.
Build elsewhere.

No

ID sylw: 92775

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John-Paul Page

The Sustainability Appraisal within the Local plan shows that:
• Strategic Growth Locations which are NOT in the green belt have capacity for 48,500 dwellings (Table 5.1).
• New Settlements which are NOT in the green belt have capacity for a further 6,000 dwellings (Table 6.1).
Therefore it is possible to meet housing need without building on protected green belt. There is sufficient capacity within the Strategic Growth Locations outside the Green Belt. Therefore exceptional circumstances cannot be met and there is no requirement to release green belt sites to meet the housing requirements.

No

ID sylw: 92781

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John-Paul Page

SG06 is not a sustainable location for additional development, it's location is over 30 minute walk to Leamington train station and over 20 minutes walk into the centre of Leamington Town. This promotes the use of cars in a present infrastructure which cannot cope with the volume of traffic. It consistently takes over 30 minutes to reach the Shire's retail park south of Leamington Town Centre from the SG06 location due to traffic volumes. This is not a sustainable location in a town which traffic volumes and pollution levels are already a real problem.

No

ID sylw: 92786

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John-Paul Page

This location has a diverse range of plant and wildlife. My property boarders the Green Belt and I have logged evidence of habitats in the fields located in SG06.

No

ID sylw: 92795

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rachel Weir

I object to the proposed location SG06 for the following reasons:

1) Green belt land. I object to building on green belt land
2) Traffic and Road Capacity. I object because there is insufficient capacity/pedestrian footpaths and dangerous road junctions. I also don't have confidence that Warwickshire will anticipate and plan based on past experience in the South of Leamington.
3) Community facilities. I object that Warwickshire can't anticipate and plan based on past experience in the South of Leamington.
4) School. I object that Warwickshire can't anticipate and plan based on past experience in the South of Leamington.

No

ID sylw: 92876

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Molloy

Meet without greenbelt. Sustainability Appraisal- Strategic Growth +New Settlements (48,500+6000) dwellings NOT in green belt. Exceptional circumstances NOT met to release greenbelt. Coventry development should adjoin Coventry

Flawed Review Arup2024.
Leamington large built-up area.
Legal precedent North Leamington makes strong Green Belt PurposeA contribution.

Fulfils Green Belt purposes. Sprawl, merging towns/neighbourhoods, preserve town character, safeguarding countryside

Not sustainable location, promote car use. Major traffic bottleneck, lack of bridges to industrial/commercial south

High quality farmland land- sustainability/food supply security.

Planning Inspector REJECTED 2017- sprawl, villages identities, gap to Kenilworth
Lose principles "healthy, safe/ inclusive" and 'biodiverse/environmentally resilient'.

Town Perception Value lost

No

ID sylw: 92881

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Molloy

Meet without greenbelt. Sustainability Appraisal- Strategic Growth +New Settlements (48,500+6000) dwellings NOT in green belt. Exceptional circumstances NOT met to release greenbelt. Coventry development should adjoin Coventry

Flawed Review Arup2024.
Leamington large built-up area.
Legal precedent North Leamington makes strong Green Belt PurposeA contribution.

Fulfils Green Belt purposes. Sprawl, merging towns/neighbourhoods, preserve town character, safeguarding countryside

Not sustainable location, promote car use. Major traffic bottleneck, lack of bridges to industrial/commercial south

High quality farmland land- sustainability/food supply security.

Planning Inspector REJECTED 2017- sprawl, villages identities, gap to Kenilworth
Lose principles "healthy, safe/ inclusive" and 'biodiverse/environmentally resilient'.

Town Perception Value lost

No

ID sylw: 92988

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Eveline Fachini Spada

The farmland and wildlife area around North Leamington had already been damaged by HS2 railway line.
Considering the area within the plan will just destroy the Green belt area even more.
It will also increase the number of vehicles on the region (as not within a sustainable walking distance to the train station), causing additional traffic and an increase in the pollution levels.
Additional houses will also cause an increase of applications on the schools in our region, which will affect and impact the quality of the study our kids currently have.

No

ID sylw: 93003

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Samuel Browne

This will affect green belt and farm land that has already been affected by hs2 works. Will be detrimental to the environment and increase pollution in the area which is already high.
There is not the required travel infrastructure or transport links which will increase the vehicles on the areas roads.
There is not the required school/doctors/food shops etc within the area so will see reduction in quality of those services.

Yes

ID sylw: 93039

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: DR RAYMOND CHEUNG

I do not agree the proposed SG06 being considered for inclusion with the plan.
Reasons:
1. SG06 is not a sustainable location as defined by your requirements, the nearest hub is much further away from points in SG06, this means more cars will be on the already jammed pack North Leamington Spa roads.
2. South Warwickshire's housing need can be met without building on Green Belt Land, sufficient capacity exists at Strategic Growth Locations to meet requirements to 2050.
3. Why keep coming back to same location when it was rejected by the planning inspector in 2017?

Other

ID sylw: 93061

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Cathy Kennedy

I can’t tell from the consultation or the map what you actually propose to do here. I cannot therefore make a determination either way.

Other

ID sylw: 93063

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Cathy Kennedy

I can’t tell from the consultation or the map what you actually propose to do here. I cannot therefore make a determination either way.

No

ID sylw: 93084

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Heather Adams

South Warwickshire’s housing need can be met without building on green belt land
SG06 is not a ‘sustainable location’
The Green Belt around North Leamington continues to fulfil the stated purposes of Green Belt land.
The Green Belt Review informing the Plan is flawed
The farmland is high quality agricultural land and makes an important contribution to sustainability and security
of food supply.
The same proposals were rejected by the Planning Inspector in 2017
SG06 contributes to the SWLP principles ‘healthy, safe and inclusive’ and ‘biodiverse and environmentally
resilient’

No

ID sylw: 93419

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bernard Davis

Although this is a relatively small parcel of land adjacent to an existing urban area, it is green belt and there are no "exceptional circumstances"

No

ID sylw: 93422

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Denise Holroyde

No supporting infrastructure, including shops, transport, drainage and sewage disposal are available. Occasional flooding already happens.
There will be no safe access to the A452. This is a narrow and busy road and regularly sees traffic jams.
The arable fields provide vital food resources for the community. These areas also support diverse wildlife which are vital for the health of the country.
The current green space is needed by North Leamington residents to ensure their mental health and wellbeing can be maintained.
There are no places in the primary and secondary schools.

No

ID sylw: 93437

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Bull

It is a strategic error to propose building on SG06 because developing this land would contradict the Strategic Objectives, as the location is not sustainable (objective1) as it requires over 30min walk to town or the train station. It would be in direct conflicts with Strategic objective 12 because it is high quality agricultural land and because the footpaths are used as a local amenity for many. It would also damage the historic setting of Old Milverton and Leamington Spa. SG06 also meets all 5 purposes of Green Belt land, so none-green belt land should be prioritized (see NPFF).

No

ID sylw: 93496

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Penny Hawkins

SG06 should be excluded from the plan because:
It is not lawful to build on green belt land if capacity can be met elsewhere locations and the plan has capacity for enough homes without building on green belt land.
It not a ‘sustainable location’. It is a 30 - 60 minute walk to Leamington train station.
The public footpaths are used and enjoyed by thousands of local residents and visitors.
The area provides habitat for wildlife and plant species including deer, badgers, RSPB’s conservation ‘red list’ birds (such as skylarks, swifts, fieldfares, house sparrows and starlings) and
birds of prey.

No

ID sylw: 93575

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Fay Kite

1. South Warwickshire’s housing need can be met without building on green belt land.
2. SG06 is not a ‘sustainable location’.
3. The Green Belt around North Leamington continues to fulfil the stated purposes of Green Belt land.
4. The Green Belt Review informing the Plan is flawed.
5. The farmland is high quality agricultural land and makes an important contribution to sustainability and security
of food supply.
6. The same proposals were rejected by the Planning Inspector in 2017.
7. SG06 contributes to the SWLP principles ‘healthy, safe and inclusive’ and ‘biodiverse and environmentally
resilient’.

No

ID sylw: 93588

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jon Redhead

This area would, I feel, be an unnecessary destruction of green space, given that it is so far away from any employment areas, and the site at Stoneleigh would accommodate all required housing while preserving the green space between Kenilworth and Milverton.

Yes

ID sylw: 93606

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Bennett

This site is a convenient extension to the already dense area of housing in Lillington and North Leamington and is in close proximity to all the existing significant community services and facilities in Leamington and Lillington.

No

ID sylw: 93650

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Parnham

The land proposed for development is used by large numbers of local residents for exercise and walking and is a considerable local amenity.

No

ID sylw: 93681

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr. Tim Illingworth

Its not necessary to remove green belt land in North Leamington from the West Midlands Green Belt for the purposes of the South Warwickshire Local Plan.
The Local Plan puts sustainability at its heart, wanting new developments to be “20-minute neighbourhoods”, where local services, including train stations and bus routes, are within 10 minutes walk. SG06 is not a sustainable location. Its a 30 minute walk to Leamington train station from the closest point and one hour from the furthest.
Farmland in SG06 is high quality agricultural land and makes an important contribution to sustainability and security of food supply.