No

ID sylw: 89567

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Lyndon Capewell

The objection submitted is based on 8 arguments outlined above which are also outlined below:

1. Increased traffic and pollution
2. Lack of infrastructure
3. Impact on the green belt
4. Valued open space
5. Urban sprawl and merging of Kenilworth and Leamington boundaries
6. Climate change impact
7. Previous planning proposals
8. The actual root cause of the housing crisis

No

ID sylw: 89635

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Barbara Munro

Traffic and flooding will be a problem.

Yes

ID sylw: 89647

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Eastwick

This development will put additional preasure on the already busy routes down the Lillington road to Leamington Spa where all the shops and facilities are. As a resident of Warren close where at peak times it is already difficult to exit on to the roundabout in rush hours. This will become impossible as the new developments on the lecister lane site will increase traffic significantly. It is unclear what plans are in place to mitigate this. This site is unsuitable for the proposed development.

No

ID sylw: 89648

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Eastwick

This development will put additional preasure on the already busy routes down the Lillington road to Leamington Spa where all the shops and facilities are. As a resident of Warren close where at peak times it is already difficult to exit on to the roundabout in rush hours. This will become impossible as the new developments on the lecister lane site will increase traffic significantly. It is unclear what plans are in place to mitigate this. This site is unsuitable for the proposed development.

No

ID sylw: 89677

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Malcolm Strens

It is essential to maintain the green corridor between Leamington and Coventry to avoid Leamington, Warkick and Kenilworth becoming 'greater Coventry City' and losing their individual character and green environment.

No

ID sylw: 89680

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Guy Ashworth

The proposals for the SG06 area, where development was previously rejected by an inspector, are unsuitable. The lack of infrastructure, the inability to make it a "20-minute" neighbourhood plus the loss of diversity and paving over of green belt, make this entirely inappropriate. There are other sites for housing development within the area that mean we do not need to develop green belt land and lose valuable farmland. In addition, the loss of this green space would have a serious impact on people's mental and physical health - we should not forget the difference this made during the Covid-19 pandemic.

No

ID sylw: 89707

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: David Harris

I believe there are insufficient facilities for the growing population north of the town, particularly as retail areas, including food stores, are predominantly in the south. Traffic congestion is already problematic, and adding around 1,000 cars would exacerbate this issue. I'm concerned about whether North Leamington School can accommodate several hundred additional pupils, especially given existing teacher shortages. Furthermore, maintaining some countryside between us and Kenilworth is crucial for air quality, as the expansion of both towns could soon lead to them merging.

Yes

ID sylw: 89727

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Compton Verney

n/a

No

ID sylw: 89746

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: miss alison rowan

This is green belt land that should be protected. It is not a good area for a sustainable community as it does not have adequate access to local transport hubs or shops. This agricultural land is needed for food security and should be protected. Our roads already struggle with traffic volume and a residential estate here would cause huge issues. This also protects the unique small villages in the area like Milverton being absorbed into the sprawl of the town. There is plentiful brown sites in town that could be used first.

No

ID sylw: 89750

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Dodd

I believe that the North of Leamington Group should not be included within the SWLP because the area includes vast swathes of green belt which should be protected. The point of the green belt is that it is meant to protect urban sprawl, therefore emphasising the need for protection of green spaces in this area. In addition, it would not be well connected by public transport, therefore meaning many more cars on the road, undermining climate change commitments and making the housing less sustainable. This therefore, makes it unsuitable to be included within the SWLP and should be rejected.

No

ID sylw: 89764

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Maskell

This is green belt land so should not be built on. It is agricultural land needed for farming. It’s not within walking distance of transport hubs. Road structure cannot sustain this. Local schools cannot contain this. Shops and local infrastructure do not support this.

No

ID sylw: 89779

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Willetts

The proposed site is at the opposite end of Leamington to all transport hubs (train and bus) and has no cycling infrastructure in place. The impact on the local roads will therefore be horrific. NLS is already massively over-subscribed and local primary schools almost full to capacity. Cubbington and Lillington have very little in the way of amenities- there's no leisure centre/swimming pools, no restaurants, only small stores and one 1 pub in each area-so it's difficult to conclude anything other than building on SG06 is going to lead to far more car travel. How does this fit with Net-Zero?

No

ID sylw: 89797

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Green

Preserve the Green Belt in SG06 South Warwickshire’s housing needs can be met without Green Belt loss, as the Local Plan identifies 54,000 potential dwellings outside it. Releasing Green Belt land is not justified when sustainable alternatives exist. SG06 fails sustainability criteria, with poor public transport links, car dependency, and severe infrastructure pressures. The area’s Green Belt prevents urban sprawl, supports biodiversity, and protects high-grade farmland. Developing brownfield sites is a more responsible solution, aligning with government policy. We urge officials to reject Green Belt development and prioritise sustainable, well-connected urban growth. Once lost, Green Belt land is gone forever.

No

ID sylw: 89802

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Villars

I am totally against this plan for all the reasons stated in this document

I moved here 2 years ago to be on the edge of green belt land and thought that meant it could not be built on

Building these houses will make the area so busy, destroy green belt land and turn it into an undesirable place to live

What can we do to prevent this?

No

ID sylw: 89994

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Kulbir Birak

Key points against:
-Lack of supermarket provision in North Leamington, leading to town centre parking coming under burden and already overly burdened stores to south. Roads to these also.
-Green belt land, so environmental impact and also would lead to Kenilworth and Leamington no longer having clear distinct boundaries.
-Lillington has only just attained a fit for purpose Surgery to cater for the area, having suffered for 10+ years with difficulty in seeing local GP we would not welcome a return to that.
-Schooling would be impacted as school sites unable to grow

No

ID sylw: 89995

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Kirk

It is not necessary to remove greenbelt land in North Leamington for the purposes of the South Warwickshire local plan, as the local plan's sustainability appraisal demonstrates that it is possible to meet housing demands without using green belt land. SG06 is not a sustainable location as defined within the plan, as the station and other key services are located well over 30 minutes walk from most of the site. The farmland within SG06 is high quality agricultural land that makes an important contribution to food supply security within the region. These similar proposals have already been rejected once (2017)

Yes

ID sylw: 90103

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Hewitt

Support

No

ID sylw: 90121

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Janet Bevan

Important exercise area. Important contribution to food production. Nature oasis. Possible cause for more traffic pollution. Lack of plans for facilities.

No

ID sylw: 90138

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs LOUISE SHAW

Land adjacent to Leicester Lane SG06 is protected Green Belt arable land that has a rich diverse wildlife habitat , nesting Sylarks , Hawks , buzzards , bats and a whole host of others would be swallowed up , not to mention the lack of infrastructure, roads and increased pollution and flood risk.
There are other sites that would be more suitable to be included in the Plan on this basis alone.

No

ID sylw: 90141

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs K Shaw

Land adjacent to Leicester Lane is protected Green Belt arable land that has a rich diverse wildlife habitat , nesting Sylarks , Hawks , buzzards , bats and a whole host of others would be swallowed up , not to mention the lack of infrastructure, roads (we struggle now to get onto the main road during peak times)and increased pollution and flood risk.
There are other sites that would be more suitable to be included in the Plan that are not designated Green Belt.

No

ID sylw: 90146

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Nisheela Baxter

Unlawful to build on green belt. SG06 is not a sustainable travel location and is a fully used farm land. Building here joins up suburbs and villages and adds to urban sprawl. Not a location for affordable housing. Has an impact on environmental sustainability, destruction of wildlife and impact on physical and mental health of people by restricting access to green space.

Other

ID sylw: 90202

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ian Hodges

I am concerned about the services that these new properties will require. Cubbington already has a major flooding problem. The road systems cannot cope with existing traffic especially Windmill hill junction, Offchurch road and Rugby Road. The water supply to Cubbington via a pipe on Rugby road continually fails leaving repairs to be completed.

Our main employer is also expanding which is increasing the volume of large lorries.

No

ID sylw: 90207

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Lee

No I do not agree This is green belt land used by many walkers from the local area to access green space. The area is unable to support forgets development, hospital is too small to operate safely for the number of people to support. One fire station again too small to support. Only one police station partially open to cover Plenty of areas that need to be re- developed than using green field space, A number of wild animals dear, bats, foxes and badgers in the area. The proposal is too far from town centre, station and alternative sites available.

No

ID sylw: 90211

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Lee

No I do not agree, green field area used by walkers. Many wild animals in area, plenty of alternative redevelopment areas are available We do not have sufficient local services , police hospitals road network, schools to support further housing development

No

ID sylw: 90216

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jane Lee

This green and pleasant land is being destroyed ! The roads the schools and drs the hospitals just cannot cope with more and more people - you are systematically ruining LEAMINGTON and Warwick - the beauty of being able to walk through GREEN BELT fields for everyone’s mental wellbeing is priceless - once it’s gone it’s gone forever and I think future generations will look back on this time and say ‘what were they thinking ?’ Please please look at the tother areas that are not green belt - they are green belt for a reason !!!

No

ID sylw: 90323

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Ocock

Infrastructure - roads, shops, GP practices etc - are not capable of offering sufficient capacity for several thousand families in such a concentrated area. HS2 has also heavily compromised the countryside in much of this area affecting wildlife and scenery. Not convinced this level of expansion is justified in Leamington given recent buildings on South side of town. Where will all these people work?

No

ID sylw: 90350

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nico Devocelle

No because this is valuable green belt, it would overload local roads and schools, impact the biodiversity by bridging Leamington and Kenilworth residential areas

No

ID sylw: 90358

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Bradley

This is open Green Belt land with many public footpaths, extensively used by public for recreation and exercise; valuable habitat for wildlife. Also prime agricultural land growing cereals.
Surveys show housing needs in Warwickshire can be more than met without building in SG06. Public transport for work, schools etc. not easily accessed and the only main road could not carry increased traffic.
SG06 separates Leamington and Kenilworth; once built on, tendency to agree further building means two towns would merge, and lose character, against purposes of Green Belt.
Landscape in nearby area has already suffered considerable destruction from HS2 works.

No

ID sylw: 90363

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Garrett O'Connor

South Warwickshire’s housing need for 30,000 additional new dwellings can be met without building on green belt land. The Local Plan's own Sustainability Appraisal shows that: Strategic Growth Locations NOT in the green belt have capacity for 48,500 dwellings; New Settlements which are NOT in the green belt have capacity for a further 6,000 dwellings. SG06 is not a “20-minute neighbourhood” ‘sustainable location’. The Green Belt around North Leamington continues to fulfil the stated purposes of Green Belt land. The Green Belt Review informing the Plan is flawed. The same proposals were rejected by the Planning Inspector in 2017.

No

ID sylw: 90413

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Surinder Bisal

Reject any plan
-
Air pollution
Noise pollution
Animal life destruction
No means to adequately remove excessive rain water
Mental wellbeing eradicated