Yes

ID sylw: 100783

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Currie

This area is a new settlement and with a Greenway rail link into Stratford this will be an acceptable solution for access and emissions.

No

ID sylw: 100809

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Andrea J Cox

There are already too many houses here without the supporting infrastructure

Yes

ID sylw: 101050

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Melissa Gillone

This site is significantly better than the BW site, as it lacks heritage constraints and does not contribute to the same level of urban sprawl.

No

ID sylw: 101301

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Suzanne Harding

Stratford-upon-Avon can’t cope with the volume of traffic already. This development will result in even more traffic coming into or passing through it, wanting to cross at the only two bridges over the river Avon that are already huge bottlenecks. This will lead to even more congestion and gridlocking as well as more air pollution for locals and tourists

Yes

ID sylw: 101419

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Crump

I do not consider that this location is suitable for even up to the 3,500 dwellings earmarked under the previous Conservative Government. Even now, there are no definitive proposals for a vital relief road for Stratford, to ease the inevitable traffic congestion arising from existing housing figures. Should the site be expanded to even 6,000 dwellings, this would cause a five-fold increase of daily traffic through the adjacent Cotswold village of Mickleton and thus lead to increased air pollution and a severe loss of tranquillity in such a significant location at the Gateway to the North Cotswolds.

No

ID sylw: 101476

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ginny White

This site is directly adjoining an AONB. The proposed development would have a detrimental impact on local wildlife and reduce access to nature for people living in urban areas. Please consider wildlife sites at Meon Vale LWS, River Avon LWS and the greenway, dismantled railway, Welford Hill Farm Meadows PLWS, Rumerhill Coppice PLWS and Coxmere Coppice PLWS.

No

ID sylw: 101721

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lisa Bowen

The size of the development proposed on the site is not suitable for the infrastructure in place. Development of the infrastructure would substantially compromise the environment and current area town and village feel. Further roads and train lines would detract from the area and harm the current appeal for the area for tourism. The area is not close to employers, hospitals etc which are necessary for further development. other proposed locations are more suitable as they already have this infrastructure in place.

Yes

ID sylw: 101760

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford-on-Avon Town Council

STC supports including E1 as a new settlement, particularly with respect to MIS.2 (Long Marston Airfield) and MIS.3 (Long Marston Rail Innovation Centre). However, sustainable transport and community infrastructure must be developed in parallel to ensure the area becomes a viable, self-sustaining community. This includes schools, healthcare, community facilities, shops, parks, and transport links. Further refinement is needed before inclusion in future proposals.

Yes

ID sylw: 101779

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Perry

1, The Camden Road is already at full capacity leading into the south of SonA, any further traffic will cause huge delays/gridlock.
2, Increase in light pollution, sound pollution, plenty of litter from passing cars on their way back to new developments in area.
3, Public transport to and from is insufficient to relieve the busy road system. No to train from Long Marston thank you.
4, This is already a blot on the landscape of leafy Warwickshire.
5, Very limited work/job prospects in SonA and surrounding area.
6, Land drainage at full capacity.

Yes

ID sylw: 101821

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Joseph Dimambro-Denson

The Long Marston Airfield Garden village development should be further developed to further ensure the area has the necessities needed in line with 15 minute city principles to reduce car dependency in peoples everyday lives.

Yes

ID sylw: 101847

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Nixon

Being the largest of the new settlement options and earliest availability to start makes this NON GREEN BELT site a more sustainable option.

No

ID sylw: 101971

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Andrea J Cox

The infrastructure and amenities are just not present to support this settlement proposal. The knock on effect of the existing house developments in this area are already causing chaos on the roads into Stratford-Upon-Avon. Until another river crossing and relief road is in place, this settlement idea should be halted.

No

ID sylw: 101973

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nick Abell

This will never work as a new settlement. It cannot provide enough jobs to be self sustaining. Infrastructure around is not good enough (road and rail). All that will be achieved is a catastrophic increase in vehicle movements through an already over trafficked Stratford upon Avon which contains some of the Country's most valuable heritage assets. Successive local government has failed to impose the requirements on developers of this location to improve road infrastructure.

No

ID sylw: 102089

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Laura Scott

We simply do not have the infrastructure to cope with a development of this size. The roads cannot cope, we have no schools with places, no doctors with spaces. The list goes on. We are already at breaking point. This will have a detrimental effect to the surrounding villages which already have an issue with traffic. Businesses and houses have already been affected by the growth of Meonvale with flooding as the water now has no where to go!

No

ID sylw: 102330

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Tasha Moss

No transport infrastructure. Congestion. 5 yr housing land supply surpassed. No railway,schools, motorways. Site BW much better location.

No

ID sylw: 102370

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Gentilli

This site is south of Stratford and the resulting traffic will overwhelm the B4632 and Clopton Bridge. There has been no agreement on the southern relief road being built. The fanciful idea of extending the railway is not funded, will destroy the amenity use of the Greenway and will need large parts of Evesham place to be demolished. The planning application for ATW has been withdrawn before it was refused for all these reasons. residents of Clifford Chambers are often unable to exit the village due to traffic. Site BW has access to existing rail and motorways, a better option.

Yes

ID sylw: 102569

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs KARIN STANLEY

As oppose to scattering housing across existing settlements, without the necessary infrastructure, I support the proposal for new settlements which will be developed and designed with the relevant infrastructure incl. roads, sewerage, schools, GPs etc. This will also allow new communities to develop and flourish.

Yes

ID sylw: 102787

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Currie

I am in support of this development providing the needs for local amenities, transport and Local Nature Recovery Strategy are met complete with a CO2 reduction plan in line with ambitions previously declared.

No

ID sylw: 102818

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jem Brown

I disagree that this sight is more suitable. Although the site has the advantage it builds on the new settlement of Meon Vale it is LESS suitable as it contains multiple wildlife which need to be protected including certain Local wildlife Sites (LWS) including Meon Vale LWS and potential LWS and Marchfront Brook Corridor pLWS. The site contains 30ha of high connectivity grassland.

No

ID sylw: 102821

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Reed

Inadequate transport and infrastructure, noise and light disturbance to the environment. Possible loss of the greenway facility. Transport options suggested for this site are weakened will not prevent a large impact on traffic into and through Sratford Upon Avon and past Clifford Chambers. Bearley and Wilmcote is probably a good location for a new settlement as it is very well connected for those using non car travel and is better located for the strategic road network. In addition there are two active rail stations at Bearley and Wilmcote.

Other

ID sylw: 102838

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Louisa Smith

There must be infrastructure in place before any building should take place. There will need to be schools, community centres, shops and pubs, so this is a community rather than an add on. There must be provision of green space to actively support mental health and well being of potential residents. There has been much new building around Long Marston, but each tranche of new houses has been built without insufficient infrastructure, putting strain on existing facilities. This must be remedied with any new developments. Business/industrial area must be kept/included for local employment. Tram/Train link into Stratford. Relief road.

No

ID sylw: 102994

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Colin Peirce

This plan to build 10,000 new homes in this E1 area is rediculous in that without new major road systems to provide ease of access to people commuting to work in the area would create major congestion resulting in increased pollution. Also the area around Stratford already has more than enough new homes available, and therefore with such an increase in families with up to 20,000 plus people to be provided with education, and medical facilities would not be viable. The surrounding villages would be overwhelmed with traffic congestion too. There is enough new housing in this area already.

Yes

ID sylw: 103025

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Severn Trent Water

This development will likely require treatment at Stratford - Milcote (STW) Treatment Works, this treatment works has low capacity constraints and low environmental constraints. Due to the size of the development, it is recommended that network upgrades will be required, alongside hydraulic modelling and engagement with STW. Overall this development site is considered a lower risk location.

No

ID sylw: 103212

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neal Appleton

Long Marston Airfield is a poor choice for a new settlement. It is rural brownfield. Priority is given within the SWLP for urban brownfield. However, main reason it is a poor choice is that it is unsustainable - no substantial transport network exists and surrounding rural settlements will bear the brunt of increases in traffic.

Yes

ID sylw: 103340

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tomlinson

I support further development since it was always the intention to develop this area providing a road is constructed to to connect the larger development.

No

ID sylw: 103364

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alisha Johnson

My understanding is that further development at Long Marston Airfield cannot take place until a relief road is built. I am very concerned that further development around this area will cause significant transport issues which the Campden Road cannot handle.
I am also concerned about development on greenfield sites and the loss of trees and hedgerows. I feel there are more suitable sites than this.

No

ID sylw: 103462

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Zoe Hadley

· Inadequate transport infrastructure; noise/light disturbing the environment.

· Transport options suggested for this site are weak and won’t prevent a large impact on traffic into and through Stratford

· Congestion will grow to impact the quality of life in these areas, including delays, noise and pollution, contravening the CC Neighbourhood Plan.

· The potential rail line to Long Marston/Honeybourne isn’t realistic. Numerous rail lines already EXIST at other proposed sites.

· The South Western Relief Road planning application hasn’t been determined since 2018. The Long Marston airfield development wasn't meant to go beyond 400 houses until in place.

Yes

ID sylw: 103606

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Wall

Ideal location, with large rail development industrial site in close proximity and a significant parcel of land already being developed for housing.

Yes

ID sylw: 103642

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Craig Joyce

I strongly support the development of new settlements. Such developments are vital, as they can meet the majority of our housing needs without placing overwhelming pressure on our current infrastructure. New settlements are most effective when designed with a clear vision, including opportunities for employment and sustained investment. Specifically, Long Marston has already commenced, and it is crucial that this project is completed fully and properly—particularly by establishing robust and effective transport connections—to ensure its ultimate success and long-term sustainability.

Yes

ID sylw: 103695

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Elliott

I strongly support this proposal for a new settlement to provision for the required number of new dwellings within the wider Stratford Upon Avon district.
New settlements such as E1 reduce excessive strain on existing infrastructure (like what many of the alternative Stratford upon avon SG developments propose), and where of significant size can support thriving new communities.