Yes

ID sylw: 94890

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: mr william tansey

adjoining settlement outside the greenbelt and contributing to 20 minute neighbourhoods

No

ID sylw: 95014

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Josie Brough

5460 houses would isolate Tiddington and Alveston and they'd loose their identities.
Tiddington would merge with Stratford if the land by the football club is build on.
Edge of the town building means no room for infrastructure which can't be added retrospectively
Accessing employment creates major traffic on Tiddington Road and Clapton bridge, exacerbated by tourists
More houses increases the risk of more serious flooding.

This amount of housing requires new planned settlements at Long Marston and Gaydon to deliver the housing with planned infrastructure and amenities to deliver more houses than needed negating no additional dwellings in SG19.

No

ID sylw: 95039

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stan Copley

SG19 is primarily green fields, some which are currently used for walking/recreation purposes. In addition there is no mention of traffic issues south of the River Avon and crossing to the north of the river. The completion of the developments at Lower Quinton / Meon Vale plus this proposed development will cause excessive traffic problems

No

ID sylw: 95166

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Matthew Henry

Edge of town development places a strain on all existing infrastructure.
The road infrastructure would not cope with the increased traffic (in and out of the town of Stratford).
A new river crossing would be required.
Combined with a new settlement and Wellesbourne it would be too many dwellings and fundamentally change the rural setting of an historic town.
Specific to Alveston / Tiddington : The character of these historic villages would be destroyed. Productive allotments would be destroyed. A bridge between Alveston and Tiddington would be inappropriate and costly due to its position on the flood plain.

No

ID sylw: 95191

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rachel Grubb

current strategy gap between Stratford and Tiddington must be maintained to preserve identity of Tiddington as a village. Previous planning refused on land between Tiddington and Stratford including appeal. Will create edge of town isolated communities with no infrastructure. Road system would not cope, massive increase in volume of traffic over Clopton Bridge.

No

ID sylw: 95199

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Simple Planning Solutions Ltd

Expanding Stratford-upon-Avon east/southeast (SG19) faces challenges. It may misalign with Priority 1 objectives, being less of a direct extension. Weaker infrastructure may increase car dependency and traffic congestion, particularly near the River Avon. Potential separation risks creating a competing centre, weakening economic synergies. The greenfield landscape is sensitive, with flood risks, wildlife sites, and heritage concerns. Development could feel detached, requiring service duplication. In summary, SG19 presents strategic, transport, economic, environmental, and social integration hurdles.

No

ID sylw: 95273

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Caroline Leeson

I disagree mainly on transport considerations. The Clopton Bridge is frequently backed up already and is the main route into/through Stratford from the East. Parking is frequently full south of Stratford so for locals wanting to access their town they often then have to drive through Stratford to access parking creating more congestion.
The West side of Stratford or North has more links into town and parking availability to save putting more pressure on the roads through the town centre and there is more space to the West of the town if a new bypass/river crossing is needed.

No

ID sylw: 95325

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Carol Crabb

There should not be any further development around Tiddington and Alveston as this area has been massively overdeveloped already. The infrastructure cannot take any further houses. The area is a flood plain. All traffic south of the river has to go over Clopton bridge, which is completely overwhelmed. The area suggested is a strategic gap between Tiddington and Stratford. Separate identity is threatened. School full to capacity. BUAB threatened. Edge of town settlements do not work, I would support new settlements as these bring appropriate infrastructure with them. Any new building should be staggered over the next 20 years.

No

ID sylw: 95327

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kristina Tristram

Location SG19 will cause significant harm to the character of the landscape. There is a lack of road infrastructure, there'll be a significant increase in traffic movements impacting local roads (B4086) and villages. The village of Tiddington has retained a seperate identity from Stratford upon Avon through the establishment of a 'strategic gap' of un-developed land, which SDC has taken into consideration when assessing planning applications, this distinction should continue to apply. Due to close proximity to the river Avon, building more houses in Tiddington will increase flood risk. Also concerns around wildlife and losing our countryside and local walks.

No

ID sylw: 95352

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Prof. Steve Strand

The proposal defeats the object of New Settlements. New residents would have to travel through the town to access employment and services. The road infrastructure would not be able to cope (particularly the Clopton Bridge) causing even more congestion in the historic town centre and south of the river. If a new river crossing were to be built between Tiddington and Alveston, it would be intrusive, require a large and expensive structure across the flood plain (a bypass and river crossing to the west of Stratford would be less intrusive and link directly to the A46 and strategic road network).

No

ID sylw: 95434

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Saowapha Saisa-Art

Too much traffic.
Not enough infrastructure.
Would need additional bridge.
Specific to Alveston / Tiddington. The allotments would lose some very good productive plots. A bridge between Alveston and Tiddington being on a flood plain would be expensive and a long drawn out nuisance to residents.
Would destroy the rural feel of this historic town.

Yes

ID sylw: 95440

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Hannah Molloy

Not Green Belt. Close to Stratford and transport links so better for sustainability.

No

ID sylw: 95578

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Dodge

New settlements are superior with the correct transport infrastructure and planned facilities, such as schools, medical surgeries, community hubs and employment. SG19 has none of this and will create more overload on existing infrastructure to the detriment of all concerned.

Yes

ID sylw: 95609

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

Development in this location is adjacent to pre-existing development and can be served by existing local facilities

No

ID sylw: 95749

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sue Hewitt

There are alternative SG sites in the local plan which in several configurations/combinations would permit the identified housing need of up to 5500 new dwellings, it would be absurd for the council to ignore such viable alternatives and instead permit any development that has a direct or indirect effect on the important extant strategic gap between Tiddington and Stratford Upon Avon. To do so would cause irreversible harm to the distinct character and rural setting of the village in its own right as well as the identity and historic setting of the nationally important and internationally renowned Stratford upon Avon.

No

ID sylw: 95764

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Underwood

There is not enough road, Doctor or Dentist infrastructure to sustain any more housing in this area. We have already had too many new houses built in this area.

No

ID sylw: 95833

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jane Dodge

This is a wholly inappropriate area to build potentially 5,500 houses.
Choosing this location defeats the object of a New Settlement which can be built close to employment opportunities and provide suitable infrastructure such a roads, doctors, schools, community buildings etc. Adding onto the edge of Stratford would cause even more congestion and strain on local services and threaten the independence of Tiddington and Alveston as two entirely separate villages. It is not appropriate to build a relief road and river crossing between Tiddington and Alveston as it would require a large and expensive structure across the flood plain.

No

ID sylw: 95841

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Rolfe

If the UK wants to retain some respect in the world it will not choke Shakespeare's birthplace to death with these massive building developments. The only benefit will be a short term one for the developers.

No

ID sylw: 96023

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nicholas goude

The Town nestles well in the Avon Valley and is essentially invisible when approaching by road from the East. This large are of development would seriously intrude into the landscape and involve the loss of high quality agricultural land. The existing over stretched highway infrastructure through town and over the Clopton Bridge simply could not handle this level of development. Focus instead needs to be on optimising the Long Marston "garden village" area and providing a much needed by-pass to the west of the town.

No

ID sylw: 96038

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Chilton

Further SG19 development would obliterate Tiddington's separate identity as it would be swallowed up by Stratford with the strategic gap between the two being lost forever. It is imperative to avoid coalescence something that has been upheld at past planning appeals for good reason . Another river crossing between Alveston and Tiddington would destroy both villages, be incredibly expensive to build and vehicles crossing the river would face the bottle necked village centre and a congested Tiddington Road backing up from Clopton Bridge . This area frequently floods so the increased risk of surface water increases the risk flooding devastation.

No

ID sylw: 96041

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Meg Sanders

It runs counter to the principles of New Settlements. It would increase traffic in town. It would blur the distinctive character of Tiddington and Alveston. It would cause congestion on the Wellesbourne Road and increase pressure on Clopton Bridge. A relief road, which could be necessary as a result of the proposal, is impractical across the flood plain and simply lead to more traffic on the already congested Warwick Road.

No

ID sylw: 96060

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Chilton

Further SG19 development would obliterate Tiddington's separate identity as it would be swallowed up by Stratford with the strategic gap between the two being lost forever. It is imperative to avoid coalescence something that has been upheld at past planning appeals for good reason. Another river crossing between Alveston and Tiddington would destroy both villages, be incredibly expensive to build and vehicles crossing the river would face the bottle necked village centre and a congested Tiddington Road backing up from Clopton Bridge. This area frequently floods so the increased risk of surface water increases the risk flooding devastation.

No

ID sylw: 96080

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Tamsin Kashap

Significant harm to the character of the landscape.
Overdevelopment of the area.
Lack of rail connectivity, lack of road infrastructure,
Significant increase in traffic movements, impacting local roads (B4086) also Alveston, Loxley, Charlcote and Hampton Lucy as well as Wellesbourne and (A429)
Local schools, doctors, dentists are already at capacity.
The village of Tiddington has retained a separate identity from Stratford upon Avon

Yes

ID sylw: 96236

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Pateman

Build housing on non-greenbelt land.

No

ID sylw: 96309

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Megan Simpson

This is a rural space that provides the only off road walking routes from Alveston. This would cut us off from green open spaces due to lack of pathways because of Charlecote Park and the river. This is the only direction we're able to walk with the children into the countryside. Once it's gone, it's gone forever and Alveston will be cut off from natural open space

No

ID sylw: 96311

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Hazel Fincher

This is a site that will have a detrimental effect on the village of Alveston

No

ID sylw: 96347

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Susan Cameron

The road infrastructure would not be able to cope (particularly the Clopton Bridge) causing more congestion in the historic town centre and south of the river.

No

ID sylw: 96357

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Susan Cameron

The road infrastructure would not be able to cope (particularly the Clopton Bridge) causing more congestion in the historic town centre and south of the river.

No

ID sylw: 96378

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Terry Gurnhill

This development will have a detrimental impact on local area with increased traffic and disruption to existing residents. Road infrastructure will not manage increased traffic.

No

ID sylw: 96383

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Pete Deaner

Already over developed with the current local infrastructure on this side of the river.