Yes

ID sylw: 96384

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

Bloor Homes Western support the inclusion of land south of the Rosebird Centre (HELAA Site Ref: 381) and land east of Shipston Road (HELAA Site Ref: 382) (both of which are part of SG19) within the Plan for the following reasons:
- Alignment with the Spatial Growth Strategy
- Alignment with the Overarching Principles and Commentary on the HELAA
- Addressing the Sustainability Appraisal Assessment
- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery
- Right Choice for Development East of Stratford-upon-Avon
Bloor Homes request that land south of the Rosebird Centre and east of Shipston Road be included in the SWLP.

No

ID sylw: 96414

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Kevin Martin

My objection is to SG19. Traffic in this area is already heavy. There are numerous accidents between Tiddington and Charlecote. I see nothing in the plan to mitigate this. This development would form a collar round the south-east of Stratford which would massively increase traffic to and from the town. It can't cope now and would be permanently gridlocked if this development were to proceed.

No

ID sylw: 96448

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs JANIE HORTON

This area is currently saturated with homes and could not sustain either an influx of people or the associated traffic. This bucolic area deserves to remain true to its historic purpose and beauty. It doesn’t deserve to be scarred by the blot of housing estates. The designs of new homes today are not compatible with the Stratford we love and which visitors flock to see. The road infrastructure could not accommodate the traffic of 5,500 new dwellings and the pollution would be detrimental to all.

No

ID sylw: 96458

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Roque Santana-Vaz

I do not feel the infrastructure elements are sufficient to support such a large development

No

ID sylw: 96469

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Dawn Dodgson

NO to SG19.
It defeats the object of New Settlements;
It would form a collar around the south east of Stratford requiring residents to travel through town to access jobs;
It threatens the independence of Tiddington & Alveston & result in coalescence of Tiddington with Stratford;
The road infrastructure would not cope (particularly Clopton Bridge) causing more congestion in the town centre & south of the river;
If a new relief road and river crossing were built between Tiddington & Alveston, it would be intrusive, require a large expensive structure across the flood plain and impact negatively on both villages

No

ID sylw: 96586

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Colin Stewart

SG19 would be remote from any significant employment options and therefore require trips through the town to access employment and sustainable transport commuting to other major employment centres. It also joins up Tiddington and Alveston villages which is against the Neighbourhood Plan and previous agreements.
SuA already suffers major transport congestion as it is constrained by the historic layout of the town. The transport assessment supporting this site suggests increased bus services could provide connectivity, however in a congested road system, these are unreliable and unlikely to be acceptable by many.

Yes

ID sylw: 96587

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dean Pipitone

I wish to express that I am NOT in favour of this proposal

No

ID sylw: 96588

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dean Pipitone

I wish to express that I am NOT in favour of this proposal

No

ID sylw: 96642

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Marilyn Bates

This development would affect:

Road Infrastructure which is already struggling;
The independence of Tiddington and Alveston;
The area around and upon the Clopton Bridge which is already struggling to cope with current traffic;
The impact on both villages due to building on the flood plain and the proximity of the River Avon;.

Why build here when New Settlements are preferred?

Parts of this proposed development negates the Neighbourhood Development plan i.e. the strategic gap between Tiddington and Stratford, which has been highlighted by a Planning Inspector.

No

ID sylw: 96714

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Page

Any further houses south of the river Avon would overload the existing heavily congested road approaching Clopton Bridge.
There is only one significant supermarket that is patronised by the more wealthy residents. All cheaper food shops and medical facilities and secondary schools are north of the river together with the Hospital. South of the Avon is in my view totally unsuitable. We need new sustainable settlements away from Stratford-on-Avon such as the BW option.

No

ID sylw: 96731

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Timothy Hayter

1) Proposal doubles number of houses … far too many, really damages feel & amenity of area, & seems totally at odds with idea of New Settlements.
2) As designated in NDP, a strategic gap must be maintained between Alveston & Tiddington & Stratford & Tiddington too.
3) Current road infrastructure is inadequate so adding so many more houses will exponentially compound south-of-the-river congestion problem, particularly for Clopton Bridge bottleneck.
4) Potential new river crossing between Tiddington & Alveston ... very intrusive & vastly costly across flood plain & surely sensible option is west of Stratford, linking up to A46?

Other

ID sylw: 96762

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) has no comment.

No

ID sylw: 96806

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alveston Villagers’ Association

A New Settlement would be preferable to this edge of town development. In particular SG19 would lead to further congestion in the historic town centre and would be remote from employment and community infrastructure. Development in the northern part of SG19 (ie: north of the Loxley Road) would threaten the separate identities of Tiddington and Alveston.

No

ID sylw: 96944

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Fearon

A massive number of houses have already been built here and the infrastructure in Stratford is inadequate for the current housing levels; with pressure on doctors, dentists and schools and the town centre roads often jammed.
Development options in other places already have good access to the main road network including the motorway infrastructure when such access is not in place from the SG19 location so would need to be built at massive cost before any further development is even considered. Once the countryside is lost to more roads and housing it will never be recovered.

No

ID sylw: 97422

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Wills

There has been too much housing development on this side of Stratford upon Avon already. There has not been the provision of the road infrastructure to cope with the additional housing developments and increased number of cars. Basically getting into Stratford from Alveston is a total nightmare.

No

ID sylw: 97447

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Ellie White

Tiddington is a proud village and building more houses would merge it with Stratford. There is not enough infrastructure this side of the river for anymore houses (schools, supermarkets etc).

No

ID sylw: 97528

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

With SG19 on the south east on the and SG19 18 on the north west BW would link up resulting in an urban sprawl.

No

ID sylw: 97548

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoffrey Benney

The recent ribbon and creep development provides no infrastructure improvement. Further building should be banned until a new bridge over the Avon is provided and not the previous ludicrously expensive idea of a crossing twixt Tiddington and Alveston. New settlements would be the answer, thus supplying the infrastructure needed.

No

ID sylw: 97561

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Lawson

New Settlements With Infrastructure First Best.
Phasing now>2050 - linked to infrastructure.
5,500 dwellings at SG19 unnecessary if New Settlements at LM and/or BW.
Town congested, Clopton Bridge and Town Centre - would not cope with increased traffic
New river crossing would be required, costly and invasive.
SG19 remote from employment opportunities.
SG 19 threatens identity of villages.
Land between new development off Loxley Road and the football club designated in the NDP as strategic gap between Tiddington and Stratford - highlighted by a Planning Appeal Inspector.

No

ID sylw: 97691

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr ALAN GEORGE

The S19 large scale development is out of proportion for this part of Stratford - there is no infrastructure/services available to support new residents, would lead to chaotic congestion south of the river. Residents would need to travel through town as there is no employment there. A new relief road would impact both villages and require development across the flood plain.

It does not fit into the objective of forming a new settlement - would be a collar around existing populations - it would impact both Alveston/Tiddington combining both villages leading to a loss of separate identities.

No

ID sylw: 97711

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sandra Blake

The proposals are unsustainable due to the lack of roads, doctors, schools, shops. Clopton bridge is already totally inadequate and Stratford is already gridlocked with traffic most of the time,
New settlements would much more appropriate

No

ID sylw: 97758

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

Position on outskirts of Stratford in conjunction with SG18 and proposed settlement BW could result in urban sprawl impacting the green belt.

No

ID sylw: 97911

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Cara Addison

Significant harm to the character of the landscape.
Overdevelopment of the area.
Lack of rail connectivity, lack of road infrastructure,
Significant increase in traffic movements, impacting local roads (B4086) also Alveston, Loxley, Charlcote and Hampton Lucy as well as Wellesbourne and (A429)
Local schools, doctors, dentists are already at capacity.
The village of Tiddington has retained a separate identity from Stratford upon Avon
through the establishment of a ‘strategic gap’ of un-developed land, which SDC has
taken into consideration when assessing planning applications. This distinction should continues to apply and that the South Warwickshire

No

ID sylw: 97939

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Dawn Chaning-Pearce

The fields should be left in situ. More flooding will occur if natural drainage is taken away. Flora and fauna will disappear.

No

ID sylw: 98002

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: H Crook

The official strategic gap between the settlements of Tiddington and Stratford upon Avon will be lost.
Edge of town housing would be created with no supportive infrastructure, and create social isolation.
The development will cause huge traffic jams and block travel south of the river.
Already large developments built over the past few years in the east of stratford, in Tiddington , and off the Loxley road, and Knights Lane.
Any further developments will change the character of the town south of the river.
Little infrastructure south of the river - is all to the north.
No further housing there.

No

ID sylw: 98056

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Thomas Park

Significant harm to the character of the landscape.

The road network around the area is mostly small country lanes and cannot cope with the increase in traffic. Clopton Bridge can not cope with increased traffic attempting to cross the river avon to reach the other side of Stratford-upon-Avon.

Local schools, doctors, dentists are already at capacity. The idea that development must come first to create demand doesn't hold water, there is too much demand already and it hasn't resulted in further provision.

The village of Tiddington is a distinct location with its own feel to Stratford-upon-Avon and should remain so.

No

ID sylw: 98075

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sarah Pilbeam

I do not believe there is the infrastructure to support increased demand on services and roads. Traffic is already heavy at peak times.

No

ID sylw: 98078

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Rhiannon Osborne

Pls no more houses. Knights lane is already so busy and we need our green fields so badly.

Other

ID sylw: 98198

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sara Kimber

Major concern regarding increase of traffic to town over inadequate bridge crossings. Also inadequate access from proposed housing onto Shipston road, Loxley road to Banbury road, and access to B 4632 which is carrying much heavier traffic with Long marston/Meon Vale plans. Consideration essential for new and adequate localised medical services, schooling and more sustainable public transport bus/rail service links especially more available cycleways, with the aim to decrease necessity for travel across town and parking. This planning MUST be an opportunity to sort out a suitable and essential bypass option for town.

No

ID sylw: 98208

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Gillian Hayter

I disagree with any further development in SG19 because there is already a significant problem of traffic getting over the Clopton Bridge into town and to places of employment. The excessive amount of new housing that has recently been built south of the river has exacerbated the traffic chaos that we face on a daily basis.
Existing services would be unable to cope with the increased population (doctors, dentists, schools). It would be far better to create a new settlement such as is suggested at Bearley, or to further develop the Long Marston settlement where these service can be provided.