BASE HEADER
Strategic Growth Location SG18 Question
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89139
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Julie Hudson
Unfortunately this area would put the Welcombe Hills nature reserve at risk. I think this should be avoided.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89140
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Julie Hudson
I have already submitted this. Avoid risk to Welcombe Hills reserve.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89189
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Suzanna Hughes
The proposed development at Clopton Quarter poses significant concerns. It would cause an irreversible loss of Green Belt land, harming the scenic openness and historic character of Stratford, while encroaching on the Welcombe Hills nature reserve. The site is a Special Landscape Area, valued for its rural charm and biodiversity, with vital habitats for protected species. Development would disrupt wildlife corridors, increase air pollution, worsen traffic congestion, and exacerbate flood risks. Additionally, it would sever Clopton House’s historical connection to the landscape, erasing part of its heritage. Prioritising short-term housing over long-term conservation is unacceptable.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89367
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Julie Beese
Part of the SG18 siteshould be deemed as unsuitable.
The parcel of land west of the Evesham road absorbs much of the rain water run off before it enters shottery brook. Concreting over any of this area would excaserbate an existing flooding problem made worse by the already built Shottery housing scheme. Houses on Luddington road are experiencing more frequent, prolonged and deeper flood waters since the development upstream. I assume the rest of SG18 would be far enough away from this water course not to be a problem. I have photographic evidence of worsening flood issue on my property.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89431
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Whelan
No large scale over development. Not develop whole area as shown. No suburban sprawl.
Improved transport infastrucure, in advance of development.
Impact on the existing residential areas and local infastruture.
Provision of new infastructure along side construction and not afterwards.
Environmental impact.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89497
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Cara Vanessa Nuhn
This is regarding the Clopton Quarter part of SG18 which is Green Belt land. I object to new developments in this area as it would encroach on the Clopton House Meadow Local Reserve and Welcombe Hills Nature Reserve and would result in habitat loss for many protected species. New developments would damage the rural and historic character of the town. Areas of this site are located within Flood Zones 2 and 3, where recent developments have already caused drainage and flooding issues. Air Quality and traffic would also worsen, causing higher emissions.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89527
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton
Don't do it, it's the green belt! There are loads of great non green belt options so don't build here.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89733
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Compton Verney
n/a
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89734
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Compton Verney
n/a
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89785
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Julian Sanders
Loss of biodiversity - the site adjoins our local nature reserve
Loss of critical habitat for many varieties of animal, birdlife and insect life
Increased traffic levels, congestion and pollution. Local roads are at maximum capacity and chronically congested. Lowering of air quality levels.
Loss of valuable green belt land which has long established pathways for the local community to access the historic Welcome Hills and Clopton House areas (also used by the local school for educational purposes)
Increased flooding hazard to the Hathaway Gardens development and flood zones 2 and 3 due to hard landscaping
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89800
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Katarzyna Simpson
Affects green belt land, destroys countryside and creates urban sprawl.
Affects landscape and ecology - loss of trees, hedgerows, wildlife habitats. Where is the wildlife supposed to go?
Affects air quality and traffic - more housing leads to more cars, increased traffic and causing more air pollution.
Causes flooding - more flooding is likely due to parts of site being on flood zones.
Lack of school places - Area E1 could provide a good solution to build housing and the infrastructure to go with it.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89804
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Christine Oatridge
Encroachment on important Greenbelt land. This must be preserved.
Detrimental Impact on an historic site.
Detrimental Impact on wildlife
Extra traffic flow from new houses onto the already congested Birmingham Road.
Risk of increased flooding.
Other more suitable sites available i. e. Brownfield sites, and Long Marston which is not Greenbelt.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89806
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Lina Rodriguez
This area of Green Belt land I feel is most unsuitable for a housing development for many reasons. Its close proximity to the Welcombe hills nature reserve would irrevocably damage the landscape and destroy the natural habitats of the wildlife that reside there.... many of them protected species.
Currently the traffic on the Birmingham road, A3400 is extremely slow and heavy most of the time. More cars not an option !!
Flooding is also a big problem in the area, more housing would make it worse.
Its connection to Clopton House make it historical. lets not loose that .
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89809
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Daphne Davis
The houses would be on green belt land adjoining the Welcome Hills and would have a big impact on wildlife. People using the footpaths in the Welcome Hills will no longer feel it is a rural area. There is not enough infrastructure for extra housing. It would have a big impact on the already congested Birmingham Road with a potential extra 1400 cars. It would also cause extra pollution which would be extremely detrimental to the air quality. Recent new housing has also lead to flooding even though there are supposedly drainage systems and flood measures in place.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89830
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Holly Whittaker
I strongly object to this proposal as there will be an irreversible loss of green belt space. There would be a loss of habitat for protected species and of a Special Landscape Area that is cherished and valued by the local community. The proposed development would also remove important local ecology and replace it with urban sprawl, along with increased risks of flooding and a negative impact on air quality due to an increase in nearby transport and its emissions.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89838
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Stephen Browett
I object to the building of homes on green belt land, especially on land that sits within known flood zones where previous attempts to alleviate flood risk have been inadequate. I also object to the impact that development on this site would have on the local wildlife and, as an extension, the benefits the local community take from the land.
The impact on the surrounding infrastructure (specifically, road capacity) would cause heavy delays and disruptions to journeys, including those of tourists which the local economy strongly depends.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89866
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Lina Rodriguez
To clarify my objection is regarding the proposed 700 house estate on Greenbelt Clopton Quarter SG18
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89869
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Daphne Davis
My previous objection is in regards to Clopton Quarter
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89892
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Anders Hagglund
- Do not destroy our heritage
- Building on greenbelts will destroy it forever
- Greenbelts are essential for people's wellbeing
- Lack of infrastructure must be considered (doctors for example). Larger settlements outside of Stratford is a better alternatives,
- Increased traffic congestion can only have a negative effect on people's (especially children's wellbeing)
- Agriculture land must be preserved for future wellbeing and indeed avoid food shortages.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89893
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacki Belchambers
* The objection relates to SG18 Clopton quarter
Green Belt Land shouldn’t be prioritised for building
* Proximity to Welcombe Hill and Clopton Nature Reserves will be detrimental to the ecology and species living there
* It’s visibility and proximity will spoil an open resource enjoyed by the local community
* The rural character of Clopton House and its heritage and historical value to Stratford will become urbanised and lost
* Air quality due to increased local traffic will be seriously compromised
* Massive increase in local traffic will create havoc to an already congested Birmingham Road access to Stratford
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89901
Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Guy Belchambers
* This objection relates to Clopton Quarter SG 18
* An irreversible loss of green belt and using good agricultural land which would be better used for food production
* Grade 11 listed Clopton House will become part of an urban sprawl losing its unique position as a house of significant historic interest
* An unacceptable rise in air pollution which detrimentally affect the health of residents
* A significant loss of wildlife habitat
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90002
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Fiona Macvie
The Clopton Quarter (SG18) is of immeasurable importance for the people of Stratford, both immediate residents and those from the wider district. Development of this Quarter would negatively effect people's day to day life including their health, damage a unique rural area, spoil a great local historical asset and its setting and cause further damage to a very important area for wildlife. In addition to this the impact on already congested infrastructure would have further detrimental effects on this town and its residents.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90089
Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Catherine Hewson
Hatton Hill Fields PLWS, Brownley Green Lane LWS, Home Farn Woods PLWS, Hatton Park LWS and Grand Union Canal West LWS
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90137
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Maria Giblin
Re Clopton Quarter SG18 should not be built on. It's next to the Welcome Hills nature reserve Clopton Farm. It's an habitat for a family of Roe Deer. New houses have already been developed and land/ roads, gets flooded - Osbourne Grove, Kensington Way, Buckingham Way.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90183
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Williams
I object to the proposal for 700 new build home in the Clopton Quarter parcel - SG18.
This is farm land on green belt on the foot of the Welcome hills with beautiful nature & many wild animals & will be destroyed for ever.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90184
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Hind
The Clopton Quarter is an area of natural beauty and historic significance given the plan is adjacent to Clopton House which is a listed building
Hundreds of people use this land weekly for recreation as it adjoins the Welcome Hills.
Severe access problems due to a private road at the top and an already congested access around Justins Avenue
Huge impact on the local primary schools which are already oversubscribed
Land is prone to flooding
Building would treat significant disruption and noise and environment pollution to the surrounding housing communities
Better alternatives elsewhere
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90190
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Williams
The SG18 area & Clopton Quarter road network could not possible cope with 700 plus new homes, we are in a constant battle with traffic now!! the Birmingham road area by the A46 island is a nightmare now! You must reconsider this plan & look for areas with better road access.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90223
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Dean Giblin
re :Clopton Quarter SG18; •Areas of the site sit within Flood Zones 2 and 3, and recent development has caused drainage and flooding issues at residential sites, including Buckingham Way, Balmoral Grove, and Sandringham Avenue. Osbourne Grove. Urbanisation: Current urbanisation of Stratford-Upon-Avon, even with drainage schemes and flood defence measures, has already resulted in increased flood risk . The Clopton Quarter site joins up with Clopton House Meadow Local Nature Reserve and is in very close proximity to the Welcombe Hills. Air Quality through increased emissions. Traffic on the Birmingham Road is already at capacity and chronically congested. The
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90326
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Aislabie
Yes, I agree with the development of the area around SG18. Also, the area is reasonably connected to the road network (A46), so needs no major road developments.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90393
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones
Further consideaton of infrastructure needed